Paper · 2019 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Growth and yield response of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) to varying drip irrigation and fertigation levels

RENU KAPOOR; SANJEEV KUMAR SANDAL

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The study was conducted during 2013–14 and 2014–15 at experimental farm of Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur with the objective to evaluate the effect of drip irrigation and NPK fertigation levels on crop growth, nutrient uptake, nutrient use efficiency and productivity of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) The treatment combinations comprised two irrigation levels (0.4 and 0.8 CPE), four fertigation levels (50, 100, 150 and 200% RDF), one farmer’s practice (FYM @ 1 kg/m2 + 10 g/m2 IFFCO (basal) + 2 g/L of 19:19:19 at 15 days intervals and drip irrigation applied @ 2 L/m2 daily), and one recommended practice (100% RDF by conventional method + drip irrigation at 100% CPE). The results revealed that plants grown under fertigation had more number of leaves and plant height as compared to those grown under conventional method. Study on drip fertigation revealed that root length, volume and mass were significantly higher with F200 over F100 and F50 leading to higher marketable yield. However, fertigation treatment F50 resulted in high nutrient use efficiency and saving of 50% and 20–60% fertilizers and water, respectively, as compared to conventional fertilization with drip irrigation at I1.0 to maintain the same yield levels in broccoli.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigated broccoli had more leaves and greater plant height than broccoli under the conventional method.

Treatment
fertigatione1
Outcome
number of leaves and plant heighte1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
conventional methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants grown under fertigation had more number of leaves and plant height as compared to those grown under conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length, volume and mass were significantly higher in broccoli under F200 than under F100 and F50.

Treatment
F200e1
Outcome
root length, volume and masse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
F100 and F50e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“root length, volume and mass were significantly higher with F200 over F100 and F50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable yield of broccoli was higher under F200 than under F100 and F50.

Treatment
F200e1
Outcome
marketable yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
F100 and F50e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“F200 over F100 and F50 leading to higher marketable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation level F50 gave high nutrient use efficiency in broccoli compared with conventional fertilization.

Treatment
fertigation treatment F50e1
Outcome
nutrient use efficiencye1
Direction
highe1
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertigation treatment F50 resulted in high nutrient use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1115 · show in text ↑
e2

“saving of 50% and 20–60% fertilizers and water, respectively, as compared to conventional fertilization with drip irrigation at I1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation level F50 saved 50% of fertilizer in broccoli compared with conventional fertilization.

Treatment
fertigation treatment F50e1
Outcome
fertilizerse2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
50%e2
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertigation treatment F50 resulted in high nutrient use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1115 · show in text ↑
e2

“saving of 50% and 20–60% fertilizers and water, respectively, as compared to conventional fertilization with drip irrigation at I1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation level F50 saved 20–60% of water in broccoli compared with conventional fertilization.

Treatment
fertigation treatment F50e1
Outcome
watere2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
20–60%e2
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertigation treatment F50 resulted in high nutrient use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1115 · show in text ↑
e2

“saving of 50% and 20–60% fertilizers and water, respectively, as compared to conventional fertilization with drip irrigation at I1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation level F50 maintained the same broccoli yield levels as conventional fertilization.

Treatment
fertigation treatment F50e1
Outcome
yield levelse3
Direction
samee3
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertigation treatment F50 resulted in high nutrient use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1115 · show in text ↑
e2

“saving of 50% and 20–60% fertilizers and water, respectively, as compared to conventional fertilization with drip irrigation at I1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1252 · show in text ↑
e3

“to maintain the same yield levels in broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1298 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

264 papers: 240 positive, 24 negative or no effect

239 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

260 papers more in this group

See all 264 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.