Paper · 2012

Comparison of direct and indirect embryogenesis protocols, biolistic gene transfer and selection parameters for efficient genetic transformation of sugarcane

Yogesh TapariaMaria GalloFredy Altpeter

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The comparison of direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis (DSE and ISE) for biolistic transformation of sugarcane by minimal expression cassettes indicated the highest transformation efficiency with ISE (2.2 indepen- dent transgenic plants per shot) and the most rapid pro- duction of transgenic plants with DSE (12 weeks from explant to plants in soil). Microprojectiles of 0.3 lm diameter produced 5 times more transgenic lines than 1 lm microprojectiles when used at the same weight basis per shot. A significant reduction of the number of hybridization signals in the Southern blot was also observed with 0.3 lm microprojectiles when compared to 1.0 lm microprojec- tiles. This suggests that the lower DNA carrying capacity and greater number of the smaller microprojectiles con- tributes to more transgenic lines with less complex trans- gene integration. When geneticin sulfate, was used for selection following DSE, significantly more (4.8 times) transgenic plants were produced than with paromomycin sulfate and an equal number of non-expressing plants were produced with both selection agents. In conclusion, opti- mization of two alternative morphogenic routes for regeneration (DSE and ISE), biolistic and selection parameters generated rooted, transgenic plants of a com- mercially important sugarcane cultivar with simple trans- gene integration and within 12 or 19 weeks of culture initiation, respectively. Reducing the complexity of the transgene integration and minimizing the time in tissue culture will likely enhance the performance of the trans- genic events.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indirect somatic embryogenesis gave the highest transformation efficiency in sugarcane, at 2.2 independent transgenic plants per shot, compared with direct embryogenesis.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
transformation efficiencye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.2e1
Comparator
DSEe0

Verbatim

e0

“The comparison of direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis (DSE and ISE) for biolistic transformation of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“indicated the highest transformation efficiency with ISE (2.2 indepen- dent transgenic plants per shot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–251 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct somatic embryogenesis gave the most rapid production of transgenic sugarcane plants, within 12 weeks from explant to plants in soil.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
transgenic plantse2
Direction
most rapide2
Value
12 weekse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The comparison of direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis (DSE and ISE) for biolistic transformation of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“the most rapid pro- duction of transgenic plants with DSE (12 weeks from explant to plants in soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–355 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microprojectiles of 0.3 µm diameter produced 5 times more transgenic lines in sugarcane than 1 µm microprojectiles.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Microprojectiles of 0.3 lm diametere3
Outcome
transgenic linese3
Direction
moree3
Value
5 timese3
Comparator
1 lm microprojectilese3

Verbatim

e0

“The comparison of direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis (DSE and ISE) for biolistic transformation of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“Microprojectiles of 0.3 lm diameter produced 5 times more transgenic lines than 1 lm microprojectiles when used at the same weight basis per shot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significantly fewer hybridization signals in Southern blots were observed with 0.3 µm microprojectiles than with 1.0 µm microprojectiles in sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
0.3 lm microprojectilese4
Outcome
number of hybridization signalse4
Direction
reductione4
Comparator
1.0 lme4

Verbatim

e0

“The comparison of direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis (DSE and ISE) for biolistic transformation of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“A significant reduction of the number of hybridization signals in the Southern blot was also observed with 0.3 lm microprojectiles when compared to 1.0 lm microprojec- tiles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Geneticin sulfate produced 4.8 times significantly more transgenic sugarcane plants than paromomycin sulfate after direct embryogenesis.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
geneticin sulfatee5
Outcome
transgenic plantse5
Direction
significantly moree5
Value
4.8 timese5
Comparator
paromomycin sulfatee5

Verbatim

e0

“The comparison of direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis (DSE and ISE) for biolistic transformation of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“When geneticin sulfate, was used for selection following DSE, significantly more (4.8 times) transgenic plants were produced than with paromomycin sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1017 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of non-expressing sugarcane plants was equal under both selection agents.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
non-expressing plantse6
Comparator
both selection agentse6

Verbatim

e0

“The comparison of direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis (DSE and ISE) for biolistic transformation of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“an equal number of non-expressing plants were produced with both selection agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1103 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized protocols generated rooted transgenic plants of a sugarcane cultivar with simple transgene integration within 12 or 19 weeks of culture initiation.

Taxon
sugarcanee7
Material
sugarcane cultivare7
Outcome
rooted, transgenic plantse7
Value
12 or 19 weekse7
Qualifier
with simplee7

Verbatim

e7

“generated rooted, transgenic plants of a com- mercially important sugarcane cultivar with simple trans- gene integration and within 12 or 19 weeks of culture initiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1408 · show in text ↑