Paper · 2020 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Impact of N-fixing bacterium Nitrospirillum amazonense on quality and quantitative parameters of sugarcane under field condition

Pietro de Santis Sica; Eric Seiji Shirata; Fabiano Aparecido Rios; et al.

3
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sugarcane is the world’s largest crop by production quantity. In Brazil, the sugarcane cultivation requires 30-70% less nitrogen than in other countries, due to the biological nitrogen fixation. Nitrospirillum amazonense is an N-fixing bacterium that has proven to increase plant growth and yields of sugarcane in greenhouse experiments. However, studies on field conditions are very scarce. For these reasons, this study aimed to assess the impact of different doses of a pre-commercial product, Aprinza®, containing N. amazonense on quality and quantitative parameters of the cultivar RB867515 in field conditions. The plant height, number of internodes, stem yield and sugar yield were measured. The leaf nutrient content was analyzed 60, 90 and 180 days after planting and the plant nutrient content was analyzed after harvest. The inoculation of N. amazonense did not affect the leaf and the stem nutrient content positively. The stem yield was increased 27.5 tons ha-1 (20%) and the total recoverable sugar yield increased 4.6 tons ha-1 (25%), compared to the control, by using 1 liter of Aprinza® per hectare. Therefore, N. amazonense can increase sugarcane stem and sugar yields in sandy soils with low nitrogen application, reducing the environmental impacts of the sugarcane cultivation system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aprinza at 1 liter per hectare increased sugarcane stem yield by 27.5 tons per hectare (20%) compared with control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
RB867515e5
Treatment
1 liter of Aprinza® per hectaree2
Interactor
Nitrospirillum amazonenseNitrospirillum amazonensee4symbiont
Outcome
stem yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
27.5 tons ha-1 (20%)e2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
field conditionse5

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“The stem yield was increased 27.5 tons ha-1 (20%) and the total recoverable sugar yield increased 4.6 tons ha-1 (25%), compared to the control, by using 1 liter of Aprinza® per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1115 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrospirillum amazonense is an N-fixing bacterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–245 · show in text ↑
e5

“cultivar RB867515 in field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aprinza at 1 liter per hectare increased total recoverable sugar yield by 4.6 tons per hectare (25%) compared with control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
RB867515e5
Treatment
1 liter of Aprinza® per hectaree2
Interactor
Nitrospirillum amazonenseNitrospirillum amazonensee4symbiont
Outcome
total recoverable sugar yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
4.6 tons ha-1 (25%)e2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
field conditionse5

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“The stem yield was increased 27.5 tons ha-1 (20%) and the total recoverable sugar yield increased 4.6 tons ha-1 (25%), compared to the control, by using 1 liter of Aprinza® per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1115 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrospirillum amazonense is an N-fixing bacterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–245 · show in text ↑
e5

“cultivar RB867515 in field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with N. amazonense did not affect leaf and stem nutrient content positively.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
inoculation of N. amazonensee1
Interactor
N. amazonenseNitrospirillum amazonensee1symbiont
Outcome
leaf and the stem nutrient contente1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“The inoculation of N. amazonense did not affect the leaf and the stem nutrient content positively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–929 · show in text ↑

Nitrospirillum amazonense · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Biological fertilizer with N. amazonense increased sulfur content in sugarcane leaves compared with the reference plants.

    Inoculation effects of Nitrospirillum amazonense and biofertilizer in sugarcane · 2023 · compared with plants grown only with the inoculation of N. amazonense, biological fertilizer or mineral fertilizers

    Opposite directionCites this paper

See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.