Paper · 2020 · Journal of Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering

Determining optimum period of withholding irrigation for inducing maturity of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) in Southern Ethiopia

Semu Yetaferu Ashagre; Yetaferu Ashagre

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Withholding irrigation before harvesting is important for inducing maturity in sugarcane. The study was carried out to determine the optimum period of withholding irrigation for inducing maturity in sugarcane in southern Ethiopia. Field experiments were conducted on two sugarcane varieties, N Co 334 and B 52 298 by five treatments of withholding irrigation periods for 20, 30, 40 50 and 60 days in randomized complete block design at the crop age of 11.3 months during 2014-15. The data on soil moisture content, top to bottom ratio of Brix in cane juice by hand refractometer, Brix, pol, purity and reducing sugars percent juice, and recoverable sugar percent cane, estimated sugar yield were recorded. Error variances for all characters except top to bottom ratio of Brix and reducing sugars in canes in experiments of both varieties were homogeneous and thus the data were also analyzed in split-plot design with varieties as the main plot and withholding irrigation period (WIP) treatments as subplots. The soil moisture percent differed at different WIPs with lowest at WIP for 60 days. Quality characters, top to bottom ratio of Brix in juice, Brix, pol or sucrose, purity, and sugar recovery percent cane increased significantly with the increase in WIPs, being highest at 50 and 60 days. Reducing sugars percent juice declined significantly with lowest at WIPs for 60 days. Estimated sugar yield increased significantly with the maximum at WIP for 50 and 60 days. The optimum period for withholding irrigation was 50 to 60 days for inducing maturity in sugarcane if not offset by rains. It was, therefore, suggestive that the irrigation could be withheld to sugarcane crop of about 12 months for 50 to 60 days but the quality of sugarcane should be determined before harvesting for obtaining maximum sugar yield in southern Ethiopia

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding irrigation lowered soil moisture in sugarcane fields, lowest at 60 days.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
N Co 334 and B 52 298e1
Treatment
withholding irrigation periodse1
Outcome
soil moisture percente2
Direction
loweste2
Setting
southern Ethiopiae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The study was carried out to determine the optimum period of withholding irrigation for inducing maturity in sugarcane in southern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–229 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments were conducted on two sugarcane varieties, N Co 334 and B 52 298 by five treatments of withholding irrigation periods for 20, 30, 40 50 and 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soil moisture percent differed at different WIPs with lowest at WIP for 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding irrigation for longer periods increased top to bottom Brix ratio, Brix and pol of sugarcane juice, highest at 50 and 60 days.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
withholding irrigation periodse1
Outcome
top to bottom ratio of Brix in juice, Brix, pol or sucrosee3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
being highest at 50 and 60 dayse3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The study was carried out to determine the optimum period of withholding irrigation for inducing maturity in sugarcane in southern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–229 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments were conducted on two sugarcane varieties, N Co 334 and B 52 298 by five treatments of withholding irrigation periods for 20, 30, 40 50 and 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–396 · show in text ↑
e3

“Quality characters, top to bottom ratio of Brix in juice, Brix, pol or sucrose, purity, and sugar recovery percent cane increased significantly with the increase in WIPs, being highest at 50 and 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding irrigation for longer periods increased purity and sugar recovery of sugarcane, highest at 50 and 60 days.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
withholding irrigation periodse1
Outcome
purity, and sugar recovery percent canee3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
being highest at 50 and 60 dayse3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The study was carried out to determine the optimum period of withholding irrigation for inducing maturity in sugarcane in southern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–229 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments were conducted on two sugarcane varieties, N Co 334 and B 52 298 by five treatments of withholding irrigation periods for 20, 30, 40 50 and 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–396 · show in text ↑
e3

“Quality characters, top to bottom ratio of Brix in juice, Brix, pol or sucrose, purity, and sugar recovery percent cane increased significantly with the increase in WIPs, being highest at 50 and 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding irrigation declined reducing sugars in sugarcane juice, lowest at 60 days.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
withholding irrigation periodse1
Outcome
Reducing sugars percent juicee4
Direction
declinede4
Qualifier
lowest at WIPs for 60 dayse4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The study was carried out to determine the optimum period of withholding irrigation for inducing maturity in sugarcane in southern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–229 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments were conducted on two sugarcane varieties, N Co 334 and B 52 298 by five treatments of withholding irrigation periods for 20, 30, 40 50 and 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–396 · show in text ↑
e4

“Reducing sugars percent juice declined significantly with lowest at WIPs for 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding irrigation increased estimated sugar yield of sugarcane, with the maximum at 50 and 60 days.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
withholding irrigation periodse1
Outcome
Estimated sugar yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
with the maximum at WIP for 50 and 60 dayse5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The study was carried out to determine the optimum period of withholding irrigation for inducing maturity in sugarcane in southern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–229 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field experiments were conducted on two sugarcane varieties, N Co 334 and B 52 298 by five treatments of withholding irrigation periods for 20, 30, 40 50 and 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–396 · show in text ↑
e5

“Estimated sugar yield increased significantly with the maximum at WIP for 50 and 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1472 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding irrigation for 50 to 60 days is the optimum period to induce maturity in sugarcane if not offset by rains.

Taxon
sugarcanee6
Outcome
optimum period for withholding irrigatione6
Value
50 to 60 dayse6
Qualifier
if not offset by rainse6

Verbatim

e6

“The optimum period for withholding irrigation was 50 to 60 days for inducing maturity in sugarcane if not offset by rains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1595 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The quality of sugarcane should be determined before harvesting to obtain maximum sugar yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee7
Outcome
quality of sugarcane should be determined before harvestinge7
Setting
southern Ethiopiae7

Verbatim

e7

“It was, therefore, suggestive that the irrigation could be withheld to sugarcane crop of about 12 months for 50 to 60 days but the quality of sugarcane should be determined before harvesting for obtaining maximum sugar yield in southern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1842 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation could be withheld for 50 to 60 days in a sugarcane crop of about 12 months.

Taxon
sugarcanee7
Outcome
irrigation could be withheld to sugarcane crop of about 12 months for 50 to 60 dayse7

Verbatim

e7

“It was, therefore, suggestive that the irrigation could be withheld to sugarcane crop of about 12 months for 50 to 60 days but the quality of sugarcane should be determined before harvesting for obtaining maximum sugar yield in southern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1842 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.