Paper · 2015 · 农业科学学报:英文版

Seed priming improves early seedling vigor, growth and productivity of spring maize

Hafeez; Rehman; Hassan Hassan; et al.

10
claims
27
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Potential of seed priming treatments in improving the performance of early planted maize was evaluated against timely planting. Seeds of maize hybrid FH-810 were soaked in water (hydropriming), CaCI2 (2.2%, osmopriming), moringa leaf extracts (MLE 3.3%, osmopriming) and salicylic acid (SA, 50 mg L-1, hormonal priming) each for 18 h. Untreated and hydroprimed seeds were taken as control. Seeds primed with SA took less time in emergence and had high vigor in eady planted maize. Amongst treatments, hormonal priming, reduced the electrical conductivity, increased the leaf relative and chlorophyll contents followed by osmopriming with CaCI2 at seedling stage. Likewise, plant height, grain rows and 1 000-grain weight, grain and biological yield and harvest index were also improved by seed pdming; however hormonal priming and osmopriming with MLE were more effective in this regard. Improved yield performance by hormonal priming or osmopriming with MLE in early planting primarily owed to increased leaf area index, crop growth and net assimilation rates, and maintenance of green leaf area at maturity. In conclusion, osmopriming with MLE and hormonal priming with SA were the most economical treatments in improving productivity of early planted spring maize through stimulation of early seedling growth at low temperature.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize seeds primed with SA took less time to emerge in early planted maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Seeds primed with SAe0
Outcome
time in emergencee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
Untreated and hydroprimed seedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seeds primed with SA took less time in emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–438 · show in text ↑
e1

“Untreated and hydroprimed seeds were taken as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize seeds primed with SA had high vigor in early planted maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Seeds primed with SAe0
Outcome
vigore0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
Untreated and hydroprimed seedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seeds primed with SA took less time in emergence and had high vigor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–457 · show in text ↑
e1

“Untreated and hydroprimed seeds were taken as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hormonal priming reduced the electrical conductivity of maize seedlings.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
hormonal priminge0
Outcome
electrical conductivitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
Untreated and hydroprimed seedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Amongst treatments, hormonal priming, reduced the electrical conductivity, increased the leaf relative and chlorophyll contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–608 · show in text ↑
e1

“Untreated and hydroprimed seeds were taken as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hormonal priming increased the leaf relative (water) and chlorophyll contents of maize seedlings.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
hormonal priminge0
Outcome
leaf relative and chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Untreated and hydroprimed seedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Amongst treatments, hormonal priming, reduced the electrical conductivity, increased the leaf relative and chlorophyll contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–608 · show in text ↑
e1

“Untreated and hydroprimed seeds were taken as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming improved plant height, grain rows and 1000-grain weight of maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Seed primingt1
Outcome
plant height, grain rows and 1 000-grain weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
Untreated and hydroprimed seedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
t1

“Seed priming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height, grain rows and 1 000-grain weight, grain and biological yield and harvest index were also improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–785 · show in text ↑
e1

“Untreated and hydroprimed seeds were taken as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming improved grain yield, biological yield and harvest index of maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Seed primingt1
Outcome
grain and biological yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
Untreated and hydroprimed seedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
t1

“Seed priming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height, grain rows and 1 000-grain weight, grain and biological yield and harvest index were also improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–785 · show in text ↑
e1

“Untreated and hydroprimed seeds were taken as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hormonal priming was more effective than other priming treatments in improving maize performance.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
hormonal priminge0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“however hormonal priming and osmopriming with MLE were more effective in this regard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmopriming with MLE was more effective than other priming treatments in improving maize performance.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
osmopriming with MLEe0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“however hormonal priming and osmopriming with MLE were more effective in this regard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–886 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute improved yield under hormonal priming or MLE osmopriming in early planting primarily to increased leaf area index, crop growth and net assimilation rates and maintained green leaf area at maturity.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
hormonal priming or osmopriming with MLEe0
Outcome
yield performancee0
Qualifier
increased leaf area index, crop growth and net assimilation rates, and maintenance of green leaf area at maturitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Improved yield performance by hormonal priming or osmopriming with MLE in early planting primarily owed to increased leaf area index, crop growth and net assimilation rates, and maintenance of green leaf area at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Osmopriming with MLE and hormonal priming with SA were the most economical treatments for improving productivity of early planted spring maize.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
osmopriming with MLE and hormonal priming with SAe0
Outcome
improving productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“osmopriming with MLE and hormonal priming with SA were the most economical treatments in improving productivity of early planted spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1266 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

79 papers: 74 positive, 5 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 150 positive, 15 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 239 positive, 28 negative or no effect

238 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

seed treatment · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.