Paper · 2000 · Zhiwu ziyuan yu huanjing

Salinity injury to germination and growth of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at emergence and seedling stages

Sun Xiao

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two cotton (\%Gossypium hirsutum \%L.) cultivars Zhimian 3 (salt\|tolerant) and Simian 2 (salt\|sensitive) were selected for researching the mechanism of injury to cotton at emergence and seedling stages by soil pot\|culture under NaCl stress. The results showed that it was Na\+\{+\}which played the decisive role in the injury under -0.55 and -1.10 MPa of NaCl stresses. The range of electrolytic conductivity increment and CAT activity decrement in cotyledon of Zhimian 3 was significantly lower than that of Simian 2 at the germination stage under 200 mmol/L NaCl stress; and so were the contents of H\-\{2\}O\-\{2\}and MDA in functional leaf of seedlings in Zhimian 3 under 100, 200 mmol/L NaCl stresses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na+ played the decisive role in NaCl injury to cotton under -0.55 and -1.10 MPa.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
NaCl stressese1
Compound
Na\+\{+\}e1
Outcome
injurye1
Qualifier
decisive rolee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gossypium hirsutum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“it was Na\+\{+\}which played the decisive role in the injury under -0.55 and -1.10 MPa of NaCl stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zhimian 3 had a significantly lower electrolytic conductivity increment in cotyledons than Simian 2 at germination under 200 mmol/L NaCl.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Zhimian 3e2
Organ / stage
cotyledone2
Treatment
200 mmol/L NaCl stresse2
Outcome
range of electrolytic conductivity incremente2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
at the germination stagee2
Comparator
Simian 2e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gossypium hirsutum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“The range of electrolytic conductivity increment and CAT activity decrement in cotyledon of Zhimian 3 was significantly lower than that of Simian 2 at the germination stage under 200 mmol/L NaCl stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zhimian 3 had a significantly lower CAT activity decrement in cotyledons than Simian 2 at germination under 200 mmol/L NaCl.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Zhimian 3e2
Organ / stage
cotyledone2
Treatment
200 mmol/L NaCl stresse2
Outcome
CAT activity decremente2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
at the germination stagee2
Comparator
Simian 2e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gossypium hirsutum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“The range of electrolytic conductivity increment and CAT activity decrement in cotyledon of Zhimian 3 was significantly lower than that of Simian 2 at the germination stage under 200 mmol/L NaCl stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zhimian 3 had lower contents of H2O2 and MDA in functional leaves than Simian 2 under 100 and 200 mmol/L NaCl.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Zhimian 3e3
Organ / stage
functional leafe3
Treatment
100, 200 mmol/L NaCl stressese3
Outcome
contents of H\-\{2\}O\-\{2\}and MDAe3
Direction
lowerinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Gossypium hirsutum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“and so were the contents of H\-\{2\}O\-\{2\}and MDA in functional leaf of seedlings in Zhimian 3 under 100, 200 mmol/L NaCl stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–708 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sodium chloride · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

salinity · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.