Paper · 2021 · Journal of Agriculture and Crops

Effects of Intra-Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) Varieties at Omo Kuraz, Southern Ethiopia

Wubante Alehegn; Amare Girma; A. Q. Khan

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sugarcane stalk population is a key determinant of cane yield and knowing the right intra-row spacing is a critical factor in sugarcane production for a given environment. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted at Omo Kuraz Sugar Estate during the 2018/ 2019 cropping season to determine the effect of intra-row spacings (5 cm overlapping, end-to-end, 5 cm spacing between setts and 10 cm spacing between setts) on growth, yield, yield components and quality parameters of sugarcane varieties (N14, Mex54/245 and C86/112). The treatments were arranged in a split-plot design with three replications. Varieties were represented as the main plot whereas setts spacing treatments were assigned to sub-plots. Analysis of variance revealed that the intra-row spacing effect didn’t show a significant difference in the number of tillers, plant population, millable cane, cane yield, sugar yield, and Brix percent whereas significant (P<0.05) differences were observed in stalk height, stalk girth, number of internodes and weight per stalk. Therefore, the 10 cm intra-row spacing of three budded setts can be recommended for better productivity and profitability of N14 and Mex54/245 varieties at the Omo Kuraz Sugar factory.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing showed no significant difference in number of tillers.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
didn’t show a significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the intra-row spacing effect didn’t show a significant difference in the number of tillers, plant population, millable cane, cane yield, sugar yield, and Brix percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing showed no significant difference in plant population.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Direction
didn’t show a significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the intra-row spacing effect didn’t show a significant difference in the number of tillers, plant population, millable cane, cane yield, sugar yield, and Brix percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing showed no significant difference in millable cane.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge0
Outcome
millable canee0
Direction
didn’t show a significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the intra-row spacing effect didn’t show a significant difference in the number of tillers, plant population, millable cane, cane yield, sugar yield, and Brix percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing showed no significant difference in cane yield.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
didn’t show a significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the intra-row spacing effect didn’t show a significant difference in the number of tillers, plant population, millable cane, cane yield, sugar yield, and Brix percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing showed no significant difference in sugar yield.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
didn’t show a significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the intra-row spacing effect didn’t show a significant difference in the number of tillers, plant population, millable cane, cane yield, sugar yield, and Brix percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing showed no significant difference in Brix percent.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge0
Outcome
Brix percente0
Direction
didn’t show a significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the intra-row spacing effect didn’t show a significant difference in the number of tillers, plant population, millable cane, cane yield, sugar yield, and Brix percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing produced a significant difference in stalk height, without a reported direction.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge1
Outcome
stalk heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“significant (P<0.05) differences were observed in stalk height, stalk girth, number of internodes and weight per stalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“the intra-row spacing effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing produced a significant difference in stalk girth, without a reported direction.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge1
Outcome
stalk girthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“significant (P<0.05) differences were observed in stalk height, stalk girth, number of internodes and weight per stalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“the intra-row spacing effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing produced a significant difference in number of internodes, without a reported direction.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge1
Outcome
number of internodese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“significant (P<0.05) differences were observed in stalk height, stalk girth, number of internodes and weight per stalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“the intra-row spacing effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing produced a significant difference in weight per stalk, without a reported direction.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge1
Outcome
weight per stalke0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“significant (P<0.05) differences were observed in stalk height, stalk girth, number of internodes and weight per stalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“the intra-row spacing effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 10 cm intra-row spacing of three budded setts for N14 and Mex54/245 productivity and profitability.

Taxon
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)t0
Material
N14 and Mex54/245e0
Outcome
10 cm intra-row spacing of three budded settse0
Setting
Omo Kuraz Sugar factorye0

Verbatim

e0

“the 10 cm intra-row spacing of three budded setts can be recommended for better productivity and profitability of N14 and Mex54/245 varieties at the Omo Kuraz Sugar factory.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑

density · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    The mulched paired row trench treatment gave 166.20 thousand ha-1 shoots, significantly above most planting treatments.

    Response of scheduling of irrigation with mulch under different planting methods on cane and water productivity in sugarcane · 2020 · compared with remaining treatments of planting methods except paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing without mulch treatment

    Opposite direction

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

density · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

density · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.