Abstract
Abstract The study aims to determine the effect of the application of solid organic fertilizers from bokashi goat manure (BGM) and liquid organic fertilizer (LOF) of cow urine to improve the growth and yield of ’lembah palu’ shallot varieties. The study was conducted on farmers’ land in Sidera Village Subdistrict Sigibiromaru Sigi Regency in Central Sulawesi. Research using Random Complete Block Design (RCBD) in factorials design (two-factor) with three replications. The first factor is the application of BGM, consists of 2 levels, namely: (1) without BGM and (2) BGM 30 t ha -1 ; The second factor is the concentration of LOF consists of 3 levels: (1) without the LOF, (2) LOF 16 L ha -1 and (3) LOF 32 L ha -1 . The results of the research showed that BGM 30 t.ha -1 , followed by application of 16 L.ha -1 LOF produce shallot crop is higher, and the number of tuber per hill and the fresh weight of tuber per hectare of shallot ’lembah palu’ variety is higher compared with a combination of other treatments. BGM 30 t.ha -1 produced more leaf number and fresh weight of tubers per plant higher and significantly different without BGM. Application LOF 32 L.ha -1 produce of shallot leaves more than without LOF and LOF 16 L.ha -1 .
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
BGM plus 16 L liquid fertilizer produced taller shallots than other combinations.
- Taxon
- shallot
Allium cepa var. aggregatume0 - Treatment
- BGM 30 t.ha -1 , followed by application of 16 L.ha -1 LOFe0
- Outcome
- shallot crop is highere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- a combination of other treatmentse0
- Setting
- Sidera Villaget0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“BGM 30 t.ha -1 , followed by application of 16 L.ha -1 LOF produce shallot crop is higher, and the number of tuber per hill and the fresh weight of tuber per hectare of shallot ’lembah palu’ variety is higher compared with a combination of other treatments”
t0“Sidera Village”
Claim · model-written summary
BGM plus 16 L liquid fertilizer increased tubers per hill relative to other combinations.
- Taxon
- shallot
Allium cepa var. aggregatume0 - Treatment
- BGM 30 t.ha -1 , followed by application of 16 L.ha -1 LOFe0
- Outcome
- number of tuber per hille0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- a combination of other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“BGM 30 t.ha -1 , followed by application of 16 L.ha -1 LOF produce shallot crop is higher, and the number of tuber per hill and the fresh weight of tuber per hectare of shallot ’lembah palu’ variety is higher compared with a combination of other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
BGM plus 16 L liquid fertilizer increased tuber fresh weight per hectare relative to other combinations.
- Taxon
- shallot
Allium cepa var. aggregatume0 - Treatment
- BGM 30 t.ha -1 , followed by application of 16 L.ha -1 LOFe0
- Outcome
- fresh weight of tuber per hectaree0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- a combination of other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“BGM 30 t.ha -1 , followed by application of 16 L.ha -1 LOF produce shallot crop is higher, and the number of tuber per hill and the fresh weight of tuber per hectare of shallot ’lembah palu’ variety is higher compared with a combination of other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
BGM increased leaf number relative to no BGM.
- Taxon
- shallot
Allium cepa var. aggregatumt0 - Treatment
- BGM 30 t.ha -1e0
- Outcome
- leaf numbere0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- without BGMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“BGM 30 t.ha -1 produced more leaf number and fresh weight of tubers per plant higher and significantly different without BGM”
t0“shallot”
Claim · model-written summary
BGM increased tuber fresh weight per plant relative to no BGM.
- Taxon
- shallot
Allium cepa var. aggregatumt0 - Treatment
- BGM 30 t.ha -1e0
- Outcome
- fresh weight of tubers per plante0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- without BGMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“BGM 30 t.ha -1 produced more leaf number and fresh weight of tubers per plant higher and significantly different without BGM”
t0“shallot”
Claim · model-written summary
LOF at 32 L increased leaf number relative to zero or 16 L.
- Taxon
- shallot
Allium cepa var. aggregatume0 - Treatment
- LOF 32 L.ha -1e0
- Outcome
- shallot leavese0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- without LOF and LOF 16 L.ha -1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application LOF 32 L.ha -1 produce of shallot leaves more than without LOF and LOF 16 L.ha -1”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · organism · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
290 papers more in this group
See all 294 papers →fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
526 papers more in this group
See all 530 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.