Paper · 2020 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Assessing Mungbean Productivity under Organic Management

Shweta .; Manoj Kumar; Amit Kumar; et al.

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Background: Now a day’s demand for organic food has increased. Being leguminous, requirement of nitrogen for mung is low. Soil organic matter could affect the soil microbial community and increase the crop growth and yield. In mungbean, roots have symbiotic rhizobia bacteria, which help in fixing atmospheric nitrogen into the soil. Nitrogen plays a major role in synthesis of protein, chlorophyll and plant enzymes of legume. The chemical fertilizers is used in huge quantity which hazards the soil and environment. Synthetic fertilizers have mainly macronutrients in large quantities and cemented the soil for worsening the soil and also the negative impact on crops, livestock and human being. The application of organic sources of nutrients improves the soil physical-chemical condition by adding macro and micronutrients both. Methods: A field experiment in Kharif season was conducted at Agronomy field of CCSHAU, Hisar, Haryana, to study the yield, quality and physiological parameters of mungbean under different organic sources. The experiment was conducted with nine treatments viz., T1- RDF, T2-FYM @ 5 t/ha, T3-Vermicompost@ 2.5 t/ha, T4-FYM @ 5t/ha + Rhizobium, T5-Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha + Rhizobium, T6-Green manuring +FYM @ 5 t/ha, T7- Green manuring + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha, T8-Green manuring + FYM @ 5t/ha + Rhizobium and T9-Green manuring + Vermi-compost @ 2.5 t/ha + Rhizobium in RBD replicated thrice. Result: Application of recommended dose of fertilizer produced 6.93 and 4.04 percent higher yield as compared to green manuring + FYM @ 5t/ha + Rhizobium and green manuring + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha, respectively. The data revealed that the SPAD value of chlorophyll, RWC and LWP was higher with the application of various organic sources over to recommended dose of fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended fertilizer gave 6.93 percent greater yield than green manuring plus FYM and Rhizobium.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizere0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.93e0
Comparator
green manuring + FYM @ 5t/ha + Rhizobiume0
Setting
Hisar, Haryanae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of recommended dose of fertilizer produced 6.93 and 4.04 percent higher yield as compared to green manuring + FYM @ 5t/ha + Rhizobium and green manuring + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hisar, Haryana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended fertilizer gave 4.04 percent greater yield than green manuring plus vermicompost.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.04 percente0
Comparator
green manuring + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of recommended dose of fertilizer produced 6.93 and 4.04 percent higher yield as compared to green manuring + FYM @ 5t/ha + Rhizobium and green manuring + vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hisar, Haryana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic sources yielded higher SPAD chlorophyll, RWC and LWP than recommended fertilizer.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
various organic sourcese0
Outcome
SPAD value of chlorophyll, RWC and LWPe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
recommended dose of fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data revealed that the SPAD value of chlorophyll, RWC and LWP was higher with the application of various organic sources over to recommended dose of fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hisar, Haryana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–935 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

fertilization · Rhizobium · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.