Paper · 2021 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Nickel Application Impact Study on Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Under Dominant Soil Series of Jharkhand, India

Arvind Kumar; Manas Denre; Sweta Kachhap; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nickel is an essential micronutrient for leguminous plants. It has a large range between limiting and toxic levels. A pot experiment was conducted on two dominant soil series of Jharkhand i.e., Upland [Sidhamantoli (ST-5)] and Lowland [Tetratoli (TT-5)]. Five application levels of Ni, viz. 0.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 mg kg−1 with pea (Pisum sativum L.) as test crop were arranged in three blocks in a glass house. An increasing trend of pea dry matter was observed with increasing Ni application level up to 10.0 mg kg−1. Nickel content in pea plant over control was found 1.36 to 2.53 folds higher with Ni application 2.5 to 20.0 mg kg−1. Accumulation of Ni in soil of Sidhamantoli series (upland situation) was noticed 1.11–4.29 mg kg−1 in top and 1.31–5.68 mg kg−1 in bottom of the pot, while in Tetratoli soil series (low land situation) Ni content was found 1.40–5.35 mg kg−1 in top and 1.25–4.95 mg kg−1 in bottom soil. Nickel application stimulates Plant growth parameters and that gradually increased with increasing Ni application levels up to 5.0 mg kg−1 in Sidhamantoli and up to 10.0 mg kg−1 in Tetratoli soil series, while at 20 mg kg−1 Ni application in both soil conditions showed negative effect. So, appropriate precaution should be maintained in application of Ni in leguminous plants and fixed a threshold value of Ni application level 5.0 mg kg−1 in upland Sidhamantoli (ST-5) and 10.0 mg kg−1 in low land Tetratoli (TT-5) soil series of Jharkhand plateau.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea dry matter increased with nickel application through 10.0 mg kg−1.

Treatment
Ni application level up to 10.0 mg kg−1e0
Outcome
pea dry mattere0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increasing trend of pea dry matter was observed with increasing Ni application level up to 10.0 mg kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel content of treated pea plants was 1.36 to 2.53 fold above controls at application levels of 2.5 to 20.0 mg kg−1.

Treatment
Ni application 2.5 to 20.0 mg kg−1e0
Outcome
Nickel contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.36 to 2.53 foldse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nickel content in pea plant over control was found 1.36 to 2.53 folds higher with Ni application 2.5 to 20.0 mg kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea growth parameters increased through 5.0 mg kg−1 nickel in Sidhamantoli soil.

Treatment
Ni application levels up to 5.0 mg kg−1e0
Outcome
Plant growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Sidhamantolie0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth parameters and that gradually increased with increasing Ni application levels up to 5.0 mg kg−1 in Sidhamantoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea growth parameters increased through 10.0 mg kg−1 nickel in Tetratoli soil.

Treatment
10.0 mg kg−1e0
Setting
Tetratoli soil seriese0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorOutcomeDirection

Verbatim

e0

“up to 10.0 mg kg−1 in Tetratoli soil series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel at 20 mg kg−1 had a negative effect on pea growth in both soils.

Treatment
20 mg kg−1 Ni applicatione0
Outcome
negative effecte0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“at 20 mg kg−1 Ni application in both soil conditions showed negative effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1214 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a nickel application threshold of 5.0 mg kg−1 for upland Sidhamantoli soil.

Outcome
threshold value of Ni application levele0
Value
5.0 mg kg−1e0
Setting
upland Sidhamantoli (ST-5)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“threshold value of Ni application level 5.0 mg kg−1 in upland Sidhamantoli (ST-5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1399 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a nickel application threshold of 10.0 mg kg−1 for lowland Tetratoli soil.

Value
10.0 mg kg−1e0
Setting
low land Tetratoli (TT-5) soil seriese0

Not reportedTaxonOutcome

Verbatim

e0

“10.0 mg kg−1 in low land Tetratoli (TT-5) soil series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1457 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.