Paper · 2020 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Quality of Grain Sorghum Seeds Coated with Different Combinations of Materials

Vanessa Aparecida Pereira Batista; Henrique Duarte Vieira; José Inácio Coelho Pires; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is the fifth most cultivated cereal in the world, has high liquidity in the market due to its nutritional and edaphoclimatic characteristics, however, because it is cultivated in marginal conditions, it presents productivity below its potential. The seed coating technique appears to optimize the cultivation of sorghum. The objective of this work was to analyze the quality of graniferous sorghum seeds coated with different filling materials and proportions of glue as a cementing material. After covering, the physical and physiological characteristics of the seeds and the initial development of plants in the greenhouse were evaluated. It was found that the coating with calcium silicate provided the best physical characteristics to the seeds with the highest adherence rates, total area, maximum and minimum diameter. The coatings with dolomitic limestone and dolomitic limestone + sand provided the best physiological performance of the seeds with the highest germination values ​​and root dry matter. The proportion of cementitious material 3: 1 provided good results in addition to being more economical. It is concluded that the combination of the filling material and the cementing material used in the coating of graniferous sorghum seeds interferes with their physiological performance and physical aspect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium silicate coating yielded the best seed adherence, area, and maximum and minimum diameters.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
coating with calcium silicatee0
Outcome
adherence rates, total area, maximum and minimum diametere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the coating with calcium silicate provided the best physical characteristics to the seeds with the highest adherence rates, total area, maximum and minimum diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomitic limestone coating produced the highest germination and root dry matter.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
dolomitic limestonee0
Outcome
germination values ​​and root dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The coatings with dolomitic limestone and dolomitic limestone + sand provided the best physiological performance of the seeds with the highest germination values ​​and root dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomitic limestone plus sand coating produced the highest germination and root dry matter.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
dolomitic limestone + sande0
Outcome
germination values ​​and root dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The coatings with dolomitic limestone and dolomitic limestone + sand provided the best physiological performance of the seeds with the highest germination values ​​and root dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 3: 1 cementitious material proportion gave good results and was more economical.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
cementitious material 3: 1e0
Outcome
good resultse0
Direction
more economicale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportion of cementitious material 3: 1 provided good results in addition to being more economical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–24 · show in text ↑

calcium oxide · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

growing medium · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

lime · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

storage · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.