Paper · 2021 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on the Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Chickpea - forage Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Cropping Sequence

H.B. Sodavadiya; V.J. Patel; A.C. Sadhu

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Background: The ameliorating effect of legumes on the soil is considered to be the most important factor for increasing productivity of non-legume crops grown in rotation. The contribution of preceding legumes is often studied by measuring the yield of subsequent crop. The success of any cropping system depends upon the appropriate management of resources including balanced use of manures and fertilizers. Methods: A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomy Farm, B. A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India during Rabi - Summer seasons of the years 2017-18 and 2018-19 on chickpea-forage sorghum cropping system. Result: Results showed that the growth, yield attributes and yield of chickpea were significantly influenced by the integrated nutrient management. On the basis of two year and pooled data, the results revealed that the plant height, dry matter production, dry root biomass, number of pods plant-1, seed yield and stover yield of chickpea were increased with application of 50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB) than any other treatments. The ameliorating effect of legumes on the soil is considered to be the most important factor in improving the production of non-legume crops grown in rotation. The contribution of preceding legumes is often studied by measuring the yield of subsequent crop. The success of any cropping system depends upon the appropriate management of resources including balanced use of manures and fertilizers. It can be concluded that growth and yield of chickpea was significantly increased with combine application of chemical fertilizers, organic manure and bio-fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient treatment increased chickpea plant height over other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
any other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant height, dry matter production, dry root biomass, number of pods plant-1, seed yield and stover yield of chickpea were increased with application of 50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB) than any other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient treatment increased chickpea dry matter production over other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
any other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant height, dry matter production, dry root biomass, number of pods plant-1, seed yield and stover yield of chickpea were increased with application of 50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB) than any other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient treatment increased chickpea dry root biomass over other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
dry root biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
any other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant height, dry matter production, dry root biomass, number of pods plant-1, seed yield and stover yield of chickpea were increased with application of 50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB) than any other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient treatment increased chickpea number of pods plant-1 over other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
any other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant height, dry matter production, dry root biomass, number of pods plant-1, seed yield and stover yield of chickpea were increased with application of 50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB) than any other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient treatment increased chickpea seed yield over other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
any other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant height, dry matter production, dry root biomass, number of pods plant-1, seed yield and stover yield of chickpea were increased with application of 50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB) than any other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient treatment increased chickpea stover yield over other treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
any other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant height, dry matter production, dry root biomass, number of pods plant-1, seed yield and stover yield of chickpea were increased with application of 50% RDF + 2 t VC ha-1 + Bio NP (Rhizobium+PSB) than any other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude combined fertilizer, manure and biofertilizers increased chickpea growth and yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
combine application of chemical fertilizers, organic manure and bio-fertilizerse0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It can be concluded that growth and yield of chickpea was significantly increased with combine application of chemical fertilizers, organic manure and bio-fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1674 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

organic · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

34 papers: 34 positive, 0 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.