Paper · 2021 · European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences

Mulch Effect on Growth and Yield of Vine Vegetables

A. K. M. Quamruzzaman; Ferdouse Islam; S. R. Mallick

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

An experiment was undertaken to identify the suitable mulch paper for different high value vegetables during the winter season of November 2019 to March 2020 at the research farm of Olericulture Division, Horticulture Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur, Bangladesh. The experiment was randomized complete block design with 3 replications. Three vegetables varieties viz., netted melon, watermelon, cucumber and 3 mulch treatments viz., T1=Silver over black mulch; T2= Black mulch; T3= No mulch were included in this study. Different vegetables responded differently with the changes of mulches irrespective of different characters. Considering relationship between the soil moisture content and fruit number it was clear that fruit number, average fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter was strongly related with soil moisture content. The effect of different plastic mulches on fruit weight per plant and yield (t/ha) were significant. Mulching produced higher fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per hectare than for the control, indicating that the mulch had positive effect in generating increased fruit yield. Silver over black plastic mulch produced the highest fruit yield viz., 24.22 t/ha (cucumber), 26.37 t/ha (netted melon), 43.59 t/ha (watermelon) followed by black and no mulches. Obviously, control plot produced the lowest fruit yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number was strongly related to soil moisture content.

Taxon
Vine Vegetablest0
Outcome
fruit numbere0
Setting
soil moisture contente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“fruit number, average fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter was strongly related with soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vine Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average fruit weight was strongly related to soil moisture content.

Taxon
Vine Vegetablest0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Setting
soil moisture contente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“fruit number, average fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter was strongly related with soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vine Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit length was strongly related to soil moisture content.

Taxon
Vine Vegetablest0
Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Setting
soil moisture contente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“fruit number, average fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter was strongly related with soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vine Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit diameter was strongly related to soil moisture content.

Taxon
Vine Vegetablest0
Outcome
fruit diametere0
Setting
soil moisture contente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“fruit number, average fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter was strongly related with soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vine Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulches significantly affected fruit weight per plant.

Taxon
Vine Vegetablest0
Treatment
different plastic mulchese0
Outcome
fruit weight per plante0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different plastic mulches on fruit weight per plant and yield (t/ha) were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vine Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulches significantly affected yield.

Taxon
Vine Vegetablest0
Treatment
different plastic mulchese0
Outcome
yield (t/ha)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different plastic mulches on fruit weight per plant and yield (t/ha) were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vine Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased fruit yield per plant compared with control.

Taxon
Vine Vegetablest0
Treatment
Mulchinge0
Outcome
fruit yield per plante0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching produced higher fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per hectare than for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vine Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased fruit yield per hectare compared with control.

Taxon
Vine Vegetablest0
Treatment
Mulchinge0
Outcome
fruit yield per hectaree0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching produced higher fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per hectare than for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vine Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver over black plastic mulch gave cucumber yield of 24.22 t/ha, the highest mulch treatment.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Silver over black plastic mulche0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
24.22 t/hae0
Comparator
black and no mulchese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silver over black plastic mulch produced the highest fruit yield viz., 24.22 t/ha (cucumber), 26.37 t/ha (netted melon), 43.59 t/ha (watermelon) followed by black and no mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver over black plastic mulch gave netted melon yield of 26.37 t/ha, the highest mulch treatment.

Taxon
netted melone0
Treatment
Silver over black plastic mulche0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
26.37 t/hae0
Comparator
black and no mulchese0

Verbatim

e0

“Silver over black plastic mulch produced the highest fruit yield viz., 24.22 t/ha (cucumber), 26.37 t/ha (netted melon), 43.59 t/ha (watermelon) followed by black and no mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver over black plastic mulch gave watermelon yield of 43.59 t/ha, the highest mulch treatment.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
Silver over black plastic mulche0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
43.59 t/hae0
Comparator
black and no mulchese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silver over black plastic mulch produced the highest fruit yield viz., 24.22 t/ha (cucumber), 26.37 t/ha (netted melon), 43.59 t/ha (watermelon) followed by black and no mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1332 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plots produced the lowest fruit yield.

Taxon
Vine Vegetablest0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Verbatim

e0

“control plot produced the lowest fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vine Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑

silver atom · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silver atom · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

mulching · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

58 papers: 50 positive, 8 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.