Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Nutrient Management Practices and Varieties on Yield, NPK Uptake, Quality and Soil Properties in Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Nitin Sood; Pankaj Chopra; S. S. Rana; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on a silty clay loam soil (acidic in reaction and medium in available NPK) during Rabi 2018-19 at Palampur to study the influence of nutrient management practices (Inorganic (RDF), Organic, Natural and Integrated) and varieties (‘Him Palam Alsi-2’, ‘Himani’ and ‘Priyam’) on yield, uptake, quality and soil properties in linseed. Results, revealed that among different nutrient management practices, Integrated Nutrient Management being at par with inorganic practice resulted in significantly higher seed, straw, uptake of NPK and oil yield. However, INM practice being at par with organic has significant advantage over inorganic practice for enhancing microbial count (i.e. bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes) and Microbial Biomass Carbon at harvest with 7.53 per cent increase in seed yield. After the harvest of the crop, significantly higher available nitrogen and phosphorus in soil was recorded under integrated and inorganic. However, INM resulted in significantly highest available potassium in soil. Among varieties, ‘Him Palam Alsi-2’ superseded all other varieties with significantly highest seed, straw, uptake of NPK and oil yield. Soil properties (i.e. microbial and available NP&K at harvest) were not influenced due to varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management produced significantly higher seed and straw yields, on par with inorganic management.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
Integrated Nutrient Managemente0
Outcome
seed, strawe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inorganic practicee0

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated Nutrient Management being at par with inorganic practice resulted in significantly higher seed, straw, uptake of NPK and oil yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management produced significantly higher NPK uptake and oil yield, on par with inorganic management.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
Integrated Nutrient Managemente0
Outcome
uptake of NPK and oil yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
inorganic practicee0

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated Nutrient Management being at par with inorganic practice resulted in significantly higher seed, straw, uptake of NPK and oil yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management increased microbial counts and microbial biomass carbon relative to inorganic management, while being on par with organic management.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
INM practicee0
Outcome
microbial count (i.e. bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes) and Microbial Biomass Carbone0
Direction
enhancinge0
Qualifier
at par with organice0
Comparator
inorganic practicee0

Verbatim

e0

“INM practice being at par with organic has significant advantage over inorganic practice for enhancing microbial count (i.e. bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes) and Microbial Biomass Carbon at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INM increased linseed seed yield by 7.53 per cent.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
INMe1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.53 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“7.53 per cent increase in seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–826 · show in text ↑
e1

“INM practice being at par with organic has significant advantage over inorganic practice for enhancing microbial count”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated and inorganic management had significantly higher postharvest soil available nitrogen and phosphorus.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
integrated and inorganice0
Outcome
available nitrogen and phosphorus in soile0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“After the harvest of the crop, significantly higher available nitrogen and phosphorus in soil was recorded under integrated and inorganic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

INM produced the significantly highest postharvest soil available potassium.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Treatment
INMe0
Outcome
available potassium in soile0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“INM resulted in significantly highest available potassium in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Him Palam Alsi-2 had the significantly highest seed and straw yields among varieties.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Material
Him Palam Alsi-2e0
Outcome
seed, strawe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all other varietiese0

Verbatim

e0

“‘Him Palam Alsi-2’ superseded all other varieties with significantly highest seed, straw, uptake of NPK and oil yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Him Palam Alsi-2 had the significantly highest NPK uptake and oil yield among varieties.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Material
Him Palam Alsi-2e0
Outcome
uptake of NPK and oil yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all other varietiese0

Verbatim

e0

“‘Him Palam Alsi-2’ superseded all other varieties with significantly highest seed, straw, uptake of NPK and oil yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties did not influence postharvest microbial and available NPK soil properties.

Taxon
Linseedt0
Outcome
Soil properties (i.e. microbial and available NP&K at harvest)e0
Direction
not influencede0

Verbatim

e0

“Soil properties (i.e. microbial and available NP&K at harvest) were not influenced due to varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–139 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results differ

95 papers: 84 positive, 11 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.