Paper · 2021 · Plant Disease

Effect of In-Furrow Application of Fluopyram on Leaf Spot Diseases of Peanut

Albert K. Culbreath; Robert C. Kemerait; Timothy B. Brenneman; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In peanut (Arachis hypogaea) production, in-furrow applications of the premix combination of the succinate-dehydrogenase-inhibitor (SDHI) fungicide and nematicide fluopyram and the insecticide imidacloprid are used primarily for management of nematode pests and for preventing feeding damage on foliage caused by tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca). Fluopyram is also active against many fungal pathogens. However, the effect of in-furrow applications of fluopyram on early leaf spot (Passalora arachidicola) or late leaf spot (Nothopassalora personata) has not been characterized. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of in-furrow applications of fluopyram + imidacloprid or fluopyram alone on leaf spot epidemics. Field experiments were conducted in Tifton, GA in 2015, 2016, and 2018 to 2020. In all experiments, in-furrow applications of fluopyram + imidacloprid provided extended suppression of early leaf spot and late leaf spot epidemics compared with the nontreated control. In 2020, there was no difference between the effects of fluopyram + imidacloprid and fluopyram alone on leaf spot epidemics. Results indicated that fluopyram could complement early-season leaf spot management programs. Use of in-furrow applications of fluopyram should be considered as an SDHI fungicide application for resistance management purposes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-furrow fluopyram plus imidacloprid suppressed early leaf spot versus untreated control.

Treatment
in-furrow applications of fluopyram + imidaclopride1
Interactor
Passalora arachidicolaMycosphaerella arachidise2pathogen
Outcome
early leaf spote1
Direction
suppressione1
Comparator
nontreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“in-furrow applications of fluopyram + imidacloprid provided extended suppression of early leaf spot and late leaf spot epidemics compared with the nontreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1001 · show in text ↑
e2

“early leaf spot (Passalora arachidicola)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-furrow fluopyram plus imidacloprid suppressed late leaf spot versus untreated control.

Treatment
in-furrow applications of fluopyram + imidaclopride1
Interactor
Nothopassalora personataNothopassalora personatae2pathogen
Outcome
late leaf spot epidemicse1
Direction
suppressione1
Comparator
nontreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“in-furrow applications of fluopyram + imidacloprid provided extended suppression of early leaf spot and late leaf spot epidemics compared with the nontreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1001 · show in text ↑
e2

“late leaf spot (Nothopassalora personata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2020, combined fluopyram and imidacloprid did not differ from fluopyram alone in effects on leaf spot epidemics.

Treatment
fluopyram + imidaclopride1
Outcome
leaf spot epidemicse1
Direction
no differencee1
Qualifier
In 2020e1
Comparator
fluopyram alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 2020, there was no difference between the effects of fluopyram + imidacloprid and fluopyram alone on leaf spot epidemics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1126 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fluopyram could complement early-season leaf spot management.

Outcome
complement early-season leaf spot management programse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“fluopyram could complement early-season leaf spot management programs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1220 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

In-furrow fluopyram should count as an SDHI fungicide application for resistance management.

Outcome
considered as an SDHI fungicide application for resistance management purposese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Use of in-furrow applications of fluopyram should be considered as an SDHI fungicide application for resistance management purposes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1353 · show in text ↑

fluopyram · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.