Paper · 2021 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

A low nitrogen fertiliser rate in oat–pea intercrops does not impair N 2 fixation

Reinhard W. Neugschwandtner; Hans-Peter Kaul; Gerhard Moitzi; et al.

11
claims
39
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Intercropping is commonly used in low-input systems but could also be a strategy for higher input systems. Three ratios of substitutive oat–pea intercrops were tested on a fertile soil in eastern Austria with application of a low nitrogen (N) fertiliser rate (6 g N m−2) versus an unfertilised control to assess the effect of intercropping and low N fertilisation on dinitrogen fixation (NFIX). The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation, but the increase occurred only in oat, while pea was not affected by N fertilisation. Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat. Half of the applied amount of N was recovered by the AGDM of crops and half remained in the soil at harvest. The NFIX per unit area was highest in pure pea. Intercropping considerably reduced NFIX, especially in intercrops with low pea share. NFIX per unit of AGDM of pea, however, was neither affected by intercropping nor by N fertilisation. Consequently, a low amount of N fertilisation of oat–pea intercrops on a fertile soil can increase overall performance of the system through increasing the performance of oat without impairing that of pea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilisation increased above-ground dry matter and nitrogen yield of intercrops.

Taxon
intercropse0
Treatment
N fertilisatione0
Outcome
above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unfertilised controle1

Verbatim

e0

“The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilisation increase occurred only in oat.

Treatment
N fertilisatione0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Comparator
unfertilised controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase occurred only in oat, while pea was not affected by N fertilisation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–573 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–721 · show in text ↑
e3

“The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea was not affected by nitrogen fertilisation.

Treatment
N fertilisatione0
Outcome
peae0
Direction
not affectede0
Comparator
unfertilised controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pea was not affected by N fertilisation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–573 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–721 · show in text ↑
e3

“The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pure pea and high-pea-share intercrops spared soil nitrogen relative to pure oat.

Organ / stage
harveste0
Treatment
Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea sharee0
Outcome
soil mineral Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
pure oate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–721 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–486 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half of applied nitrogen was recovered in crop above-ground dry matter.

Taxon
cropse0
Outcome
N was recovered by the AGDMe0
Value
Half of the applied amount of Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“Half of the applied amount of N was recovered by the AGDM of crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–788 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half of applied nitrogen remained in the soil at harvest.

Taxon
cropse2e3
Outcome
remained in the soil at harveste0
Value
halfe0

Verbatim

e0

“half remained in the soil at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–721 · show in text ↑
e3

“The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–486 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fixation per unit area was highest in pure pea.

Material
pure peae0
Outcome
NFIX per unit areae0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NFIX per unit area was highest in pure pea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–878 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–721 · show in text ↑
e3

“The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced nitrogen fixation, especially with low pea share.

Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
NFIXe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
intercrops with low pea sharee0
Comparator
pure peae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping considerably reduced NFIX, especially in intercrops with low pea share.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–721 · show in text ↑
e3

“The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fixation per unit pea dry matter was unaffected by intercropping.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
NFIX per unit of AGDM of peae0
Direction
neither affectede0
Comparator
pure peae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NFIX per unit of AGDM of pea, however, was neither affected by intercropping nor by N fertilisation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–721 · show in text ↑
e3

“The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fixation per unit pea dry matter was unaffected by fertilisation.

Treatment
N fertilisatione0
Outcome
NFIX per unit of AGDM of peae0
Direction
neither affectede0
Comparator
unfertilised controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NFIX per unit of AGDM of pea, however, was neither affected by intercropping nor by N fertilisation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–721 · show in text ↑
e3

“The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen fertilisation can improve oat–pea intercrop system performance through oat without impairing pea.

Taxon
oat–pea intercropse0
Treatment
a low amount of N fertilisatione0
Outcome
increase overall performance of the systeme0
Qualifier
without impairing that of peae0

Verbatim

e0

“a low amount of N fertilisation of oat–pea intercrops on a fertile soil can increase overall performance of the system through increasing the performance of oat without impairing that of pea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1271 · show in text ↑
e1

“unfertilised control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–301 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pure pea stands and intercrops with high pea share resulted in N sparing in the soil at harvest, as the soil mineral N was higher than in pure oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–721 · show in text ↑
e3

“The above-ground dry matter (AGDM) and N yield of intercrops increased with N fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–486 · show in text ↑

intercropping · molecular: metabolites · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.