Paper · 2021 · JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN AGRICULTURE

Using Quinclorac to Control Annual Grasses and Palmer Amaranth in Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

James Grichar; Travis Janak

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during the 2015 and 2016 growing seasons in south-central Texas to determine control of Palmer amaranth and annual grasses along with grain sorghum tolerance to quinclorac alone and in various combinations when applied to weeds < 5 cm (EPOST) or 10 to 16 cm tall (LPOST). When evaluated late-season quinclorac alone at 0.43 kg ae ha-1 controlled broadleaf signalgrass 72% when applied EPOST and 91% when applied LPOST. Combinations of quinclorac with either atrazine, pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil, dicamba, or dimethenamid-P controlled Palmer amaranth 88 to 100% when applied EPOST or LPOST; however, broadleaf signalgrass control with these combination was better when applied LPOST (75 to 95%) compared with EPOST (37 to 72%) applications. Texas millet control with quinclorac was poor in both years and was never greater than 54%. Quinclorac plus either atrazine, pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil, dicamba, or atrazine + dimethenamid-P caused at least 20% sorghum injury at one of three locations. No yield reductions from the untreated check were noted in either year; however, in 2016 all treatments with the exception of quinclorac alone at 0.29 kg ha-1 applied EPOST, quinclorac + pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil applied LPOST, quinclorac + atrazine + pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil applied LPOST, and quinclorac + dicamba at either application timing produced yields that were greater than the untreated check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quinclorac controlled broadleaf signalgrass 72% with EPOST application.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
quinclorac alone at 0.43 kg ae ha-1e0
Interactor
broadleaf signalgrassUrochloa platyphyllae0weed
Outcome
broadleaf signalgrasse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Urochloa platyphylla
Urochloa platyphylla · InteractorAndrés González · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quinclorac alone at 0.43 kg ae ha-1 controlled broadleaf signalgrass 72% when applied EPOST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quinclorac controlled broadleaf signalgrass 91% with LPOST application.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
quinclorac alone at 0.43 kg ae ha-1e0
Interactor
broadleaf signalgrassUrochloa platyphyllae0weed
Outcome
broadleaf signalgrasse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
91%e0
Qualifier
LPOSTe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Urochloa platyphylla
Urochloa platyphylla · InteractorAndrés González · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quinclorac alone at 0.43 kg ae ha-1 controlled broadleaf signalgrass 72% when applied EPOST and 91% when applied LPOST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quinclorac combinations controlled Palmer amaranth 88 to 100%.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Combinations of quinclorac with either atrazine, pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil, dicamba, or dimethenamid-Pe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranthe0
Direction
controllede0
Value
88 to 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combinations of quinclorac with either atrazine, pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil, dicamba, or dimethenamid-P controlled Palmer amaranth 88 to 100% when applied EPOST or LPOST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadleaf signalgrass control with quinclorac combinations was better with LPOST than EPOST application.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
LPOSTe0
Interactor
broadleaf signalgrassUrochloa platyphyllae0weed
Outcome
broadleaf signalgrass controle0
Direction
bettere0
Value
75 to 95%e0
Qualifier
37 to 72%e0
Comparator
EPOSTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Urochloa platyphylla
Urochloa platyphylla · InteractorAndrés González · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broadleaf signalgrass control with these combination was better when applied LPOST (75 to 95%) compared with EPOST (37 to 72%) applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Texas millet control with quinclorac was poor and never exceeded 54%.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
quinclorace0
Interactor
Texas millete0weed
Outcome
Texas millet controle0
Direction
poore0
Value
54%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Texas millet control with quinclorac was poor in both years and was never greater than 54%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several quinclorac combinations caused at least 20% sorghum injury at one of three locations.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Quinclorac plus either atrazine, pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil, dicamba, or atrazine + dimethenamid-Pe0
Outcome
sorghum injurye0
Direction
causede0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quinclorac plus either atrazine, pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil, dicamba, or atrazine + dimethenamid-P caused at least 20% sorghum injury at one of three locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No yield reductions relative to untreated check were noted in either year.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
No yield reductionse0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No yield reductions from the untreated check were noted in either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2016 most treatments produced yields greater than the untreated check, with stated exceptions.

Taxon
Grain SorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
with the exception of quinclorac alone at 0.29 kg ha-1 applied EPOST, quinclorac + pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil applied LPOST, quinclorac + atrazine + pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil applied LPOST, and quinclorac + dicamba at either application timinge0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2016 all treatments with the exception of quinclorac alone at 0.29 kg ha-1 applied EPOST, quinclorac + pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil applied LPOST, quinclorac + atrazine + pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil applied LPOST, and quinclorac + dicamba at either application timing produced yields that were greater than the untreated check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 · show in text ↑

quinclorac · Urochloa platyphylla · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

dicamba · crop injury · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

atrazine · crop injury · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

pyrasulfotole · crop injury · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · crop injury · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

atrazine · organism · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.