Paper · 2017 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Cane yield and soil nutrient balance in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) plant-ratoon system under integrated nutrient management in mollisols of Uttarakhand

Jyoti Pawar; Dheer Singh

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted during 2015–16 and 2016–17 at the NE Borlaug Crop Research Centre, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, to study suitable integrated nutrient management module for sustaining soil health and productivity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)-ratoon system. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with 10 treatments in 3 replications. The treatments comprised different combinations of organic sources and inorganic fertilizers along with inorganic fertilizers alone. The results revealed that application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendation in both plant and ratoon crop significantly improved yield attributes and cane yield over rest of the treatments except FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) and RDF + S + Zn. It also recorded higher cane length (439.0 and 407.4 cm), cane girth (9.6 and 9.0 cm), individual cane weight (1, 268.7 and 1, 175.4 g), number of millable canes (NMC) (83.6 and 75.6 thousand/ha) and cane yield (76.5 and 74.5 t/ha) in plant and ratoon crops, respectively. The net N, P and K balance in soil was found to be positive in treatments receiving integrated nutrient supply, while it was negative under application of inorganic fertilizers alone in plant and ratoon crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM/compost at 20 t/ha with soil test-based recommendation significantly improved yield attributes and cane yield over the other treatments, except two treatments.

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Treatment
application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendatione1
Outcome
yield attributes and cane yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1
Setting
NE Borlaug Crop Research Centre, Pantnagar, Uttarakhande0

Verbatim

e0

“A field trial was conducted during 2015–16 and 2016–17 at the NE Borlaug Crop Research Centre, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendation in both plant and ratoon crop significantly improved yield attributes and cane yield over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–710 · show in text ↑
e3

“productivity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)-ratoon system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane length was higher under the integrated treatment in plant and ratoon crops (439.0 and 407.4 cm).

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Treatment
application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendatione1
Outcome
cane lengthe2
Direction
highere2
Value
439.0 and 407.4 cme2
Qualifier
plant and ratoon cropse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendation in both plant and ratoon crop significantly improved yield attributes and cane yield over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–710 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also recorded higher cane length (439.0 and 407.4 cm), cane girth (9.6 and 9.0 cm), individual cane weight (1, 268.7 and 1, 175.4 g), number of millable canes (NMC) (83.6 and 75.6 thousand/ha) and cane yield (76.5 and 74.5 t/ha) in plant and ratoon crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1068 · show in text ↑
e3

“productivity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)-ratoon system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane girth was higher under the integrated treatment in plant and ratoon crops (9.6 and 9.0 cm).

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Treatment
application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendatione1
Outcome
cane girthe2
Direction
highere2
Value
9.6 and 9.0 cme2
Qualifier
plant and ratoon cropse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendation in both plant and ratoon crop significantly improved yield attributes and cane yield over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–710 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also recorded higher cane length (439.0 and 407.4 cm), cane girth (9.6 and 9.0 cm), individual cane weight (1, 268.7 and 1, 175.4 g), number of millable canes (NMC) (83.6 and 75.6 thousand/ha) and cane yield (76.5 and 74.5 t/ha) in plant and ratoon crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1068 · show in text ↑
e3

“productivity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)-ratoon system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual cane weight was higher under the integrated treatment in plant and ratoon crops (1,268.7 and 1,175.4 g).

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Treatment
application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendatione1
Outcome
individual cane weighte2
Direction
highere2
Value
1, 268.7 and 1, 175.4 ge2
Qualifier
plant and ratoon cropse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendation in both plant and ratoon crop significantly improved yield attributes and cane yield over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–710 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also recorded higher cane length (439.0 and 407.4 cm), cane girth (9.6 and 9.0 cm), individual cane weight (1, 268.7 and 1, 175.4 g), number of millable canes (NMC) (83.6 and 75.6 thousand/ha) and cane yield (76.5 and 74.5 t/ha) in plant and ratoon crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1068 · show in text ↑
e3

“productivity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)-ratoon system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of millable canes was higher under the integrated treatment in plant and ratoon crops (83.6 and 75.6 thousand/ha).

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Treatment
application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendatione1
Outcome
number of millable canes (NMC)e2
Direction
highere2
Value
83.6 and 75.6 thousand/hae2
Qualifier
plant and ratoon cropse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendation in both plant and ratoon crop significantly improved yield attributes and cane yield over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–710 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also recorded higher cane length (439.0 and 407.4 cm), cane girth (9.6 and 9.0 cm), individual cane weight (1, 268.7 and 1, 175.4 g), number of millable canes (NMC) (83.6 and 75.6 thousand/ha) and cane yield (76.5 and 74.5 t/ha) in plant and ratoon crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1068 · show in text ↑
e3

“productivity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)-ratoon system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield was higher under the integrated treatment in plant and ratoon crops (76.5 and 74.5 t/ha).

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Treatment
application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendatione1
Outcome
cane yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
76.5 and 74.5 t/hae2
Qualifier
plant and ratoon cropse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“application of FYM/compost @ 20 t/ha + soil test-based recommendation in both plant and ratoon crop significantly improved yield attributes and cane yield over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–710 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also recorded higher cane length (439.0 and 407.4 cm), cane girth (9.6 and 9.0 cm), individual cane weight (1, 268.7 and 1, 175.4 g), number of millable canes (NMC) (83.6 and 75.6 thousand/ha) and cane yield (76.5 and 74.5 t/ha) in plant and ratoon crops, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1068 · show in text ↑
e3

“productivity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)-ratoon system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net N, P and K balance in soil was positive under integrated nutrient supply, compared with inorganic fertilizers alone.

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Treatment
integrated nutrient supplye4
Outcome
net N, P and K balance in soile4
Direction
positivee4
Comparator
inorganic fertilizers alonee4

Verbatim

e3

“productivity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)-ratoon system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–272 · show in text ↑
e4

“The net N, P and K balance in soil was found to be positive in treatments receiving integrated nutrient supply, while it was negative under application of inorganic fertilizers alone in plant and ratoon crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net N, P and K balance in soil was negative under inorganic fertilizers alone, compared with integrated nutrient supply.

Taxon
sugarcanee3
Treatment
application of inorganic fertilizers alonee4
Outcome
net N, P and K balance in soile4
Direction
negativee4
Comparator
treatments receiving integrated nutrient supplye4

Verbatim

e3

“productivity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)-ratoon system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–272 · show in text ↑
e4

“The net N, P and K balance in soil was found to be positive in treatments receiving integrated nutrient supply, while it was negative under application of inorganic fertilizers alone in plant and ratoon crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1277 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.