Paper · 2021 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Relative time of planting of legumes (cowpea, soybean and groundnut) on weed suppression and yield in cassava cropping system

Joseph Taah Kingsley; Ogyiri Adu Emmanuel

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Weeds are a serious problem farmer’s face in tropical Africa, which significantly reduces yield. Field trials were conducted from September 2013 to September 2014 to determine the appropriate relative time of planting of legumes in cassava cropping system for optimum weed suppression. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replicates. Treatments consisted of combinations of three relative times of planting for each of the three legumes (cowpea, soybean, and groundnut). One sole crop each of the legumes and cassava was added for comparison. The results indicated that early introduction of the legume (intercrop) into the cassava showed efficient weed control. The late introduction of the legume (intercrop) into the cassava decreased cassava yield whilst early introduction of the legume into the cassava increased cassava yield. Results from the study also revealed that the relative time of planting did not show any significant difference among the legume grain yield. However, late introduction of the cassava into the intercrop resulted in the highest grain yield. Key words: Weeds, cassava, legumes, cropping system, relative planting times.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early legume introduction into cassava gave efficient weed control.

Treatment
early introduction of the legume (intercrop)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“early introduction of the legume (intercrop) into the cassava showed efficient weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late legume introduction decreased cassava yield.

Treatment
late introduction of the legume (intercrop)e0
Outcome
cassava yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“late introduction of the legume (intercrop) into the cassava decreased cassava yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early legume introduction increased cassava yield.

Treatment
early introduction of the legumee0
Outcome
cassava yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“early introduction of the legume into the cassava increased cassava yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative planting time did not significantly differ for legume grain yield.

Taxon
legumee0
Treatment
relative time of plantinge0
Outcome
legume grain yielde0
Direction
did not show any significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“relative time of planting did not show any significant difference among the legume grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late introduction of cassava gave the highest legume grain yield.

Treatment
late introduction of the cassavae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“late introduction of the cassava into the intercrop resulted in the highest grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1117 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

intercropping · weed · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.