Abstract
Production of mungbean has been increasing in Ethiopia because of its high importance as a source of protein and foreign exchange earnings. Determination of appropriate plant density for the varieties of mungbean can increase its productivity. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to determine the effect of inter and intra row spacing on growth, yield components and yield of mung bean varieties under irrigation. The treatments consisted of factorial combinations of three inter row spacing (30, 40, and 50 cm), three-intra row spacing (5, 10 and 15 cm) and two mungbean varieties (N-26 and MH-97) laid out in randomized complete block design with three Replications. The main effect of varieties, inter row spacing and intra row spacing was highly significant and significant on plant height, secondary branch and where the longest plant height (41.71 cm) was for variety MH-97 and from 5 cm intra row spacing, respectively and maximum number of secondary branch was recorded for variety MH-97 (8.91) and from 15cm intra row and 50cm inter row spacing, respectively. The interaction effect of the variety, inter and intra row spacing was highly significant on number of primary branch per plant, number of pod per plant and crop stand count percentage where the highest number of primary branches (7.00) was recorded from variety MH-97 at 50 cm inter row spacing and highest number pods per plant (30.15) were recorded for variety MH-97 at 40 cm inter row and (31.34) at 15cm intra row spacing. Where the highest crop stand count at harvest were recorded from variety MH-97 (97.00%) at 40 cm inter row spacing .The main effect of inter row spacing and intra row spacing were highly significant and significant on above ground dry biomass and the highest above ground dry biomass at inter row spacing of 30 cm ( 5968.8 kg ha-1) and intra row spacing 5cm 6145.9 kg ha-1).The main effect of variety, inter-row and intra-row spacing were highly significant on harvest index and grain yield where the highest harvest index was from variety MH-97 (20.91%), inter row spacing of 40 cm which give (21.18%) and intra row spacing 10 cm which give (20.30%) and the highest grain yield from Variety MH-97 (1117.94 kg ha-1), inter row spacing 40 cm (1213.75 kg ha-1) and intra row spacing 10 cm which give (1151.67 kg ha-1) However, this tentative generalization based one season at one location requires further studies over years and locations to give a valid recommendation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
MH-97 at 5 cm intra-row spacing had the longest plant height of 41.71 cm.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- MH-97e0
- Treatment
- 5 cm intra row spacinge0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- longeste0
- Value
- 41.71 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the longest plant height (41.71 cm) was for variety MH-97 and from 5 cm intra row spacing”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
MH-97 had the maximum secondary branch number of 8.91.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- MH-97e0
- Outcome
- number of secondary branche0
- Value
- 8.91e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum number of secondary branch was recorded for variety MH-97 (8.91)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
At 15 cm intra-row spacing and 50 cm inter-row spacing, secondary branch number was maximal.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- 15cm intra row and 50cm inter row spacinge0
- Outcome
- number of secondary branche0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum number of secondary branch was recorded for variety MH-97 (8.91) and from 15cm intra row and 50cm inter row spacing, respectively.”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
MH-97 at 50 cm inter-row spacing had the highest primary branch number, 7.00.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- MH-97e0
- Treatment
- 50 cm inter row spacinge0
- Outcome
- number of primary branchese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 7.00e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest number of primary branches (7.00) was recorded from variety MH-97 at 50 cm inter row spacing”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
MH-97 at 40 cm inter-row spacing had the highest pods per plant, 30.15.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- MH-97e0
- Treatment
- 40 cm inter rowe0
- Outcome
- number pods per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 30.15e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest number pods per plant (30.15) were recorded for variety MH-97 at 40 cm inter row”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
At 15 cm intra-row spacing, the highest pods per plant was 31.34.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- 15cm intra row spacinge0
- Outcome
- number pods per plante1
- Value
- 31.34e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“and (31.34) at 15cm intra row spacing”
e1“highest number pods per plant (30.15) were recorded for variety MH-97”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
MH-97 at 40 cm inter-row spacing had the highest crop stand count at harvest, 97.00%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- MH-97e0
- Treatment
- 40 cm inter row spacinge0
- Outcome
- crop stand count at harveste0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 97.00%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest crop stand count at harvest were recorded from variety MH-97 (97.00%) at 40 cm inter row spacing”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
At 30 cm inter-row spacing, aboveground dry biomass was highest at 5968.8 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- inter row spacing of 30 cme0
- Outcome
- above ground dry biomasse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5968.8 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest above ground dry biomass at inter row spacing of 30 cm ( 5968.8 kg ha-1)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
At 5 cm intra-row spacing, aboveground dry biomass reached 6145.9 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- intra row spacing 5cme0
- Outcome
- above ground dry biomasse1
- Value
- 6145.9 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intra row spacing 5cm 6145.9 kg ha-1”
e1“highest above ground dry biomass at inter row spacing of 30 cm”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
MH-97 had the highest harvest index, 20.91%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- MH-97e0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Value
- 20.91%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest harvest index was from variety MH-97 (20.91%)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
At 40 cm inter-row spacing, harvest index was 21.18%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- inter row spacing of 40 cme0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe1
- Value
- 21.18%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inter row spacing of 40 cm which give (21.18%)”
e1“highest harvest index was from variety MH-97”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
At 10 cm intra-row spacing, harvest index was 20.30%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- intra row spacing 10 cme0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe1
- Value
- 20.30%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intra row spacing 10 cm which give (20.30%)”
e1“highest harvest index was from variety MH-97”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
MH-97 had the highest grain yield, 1117.94 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- MH-97e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Value
- 1117.94 kg ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest grain yield from Variety MH-97 (1117.94 kg ha-1)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
At 40 cm inter-row spacing, grain yield was 1213.75 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- inter row spacing 40 cme0
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Value
- 1213.75 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inter row spacing 40 cm (1213.75 kg ha-1)”
e1“highest grain yield from Variety MH-97”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
At 10 cm intra-row spacing, grain yield was 1151.67 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- intra row spacing 10 cme0
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Value
- 1151.67 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intra row spacing 10 cm which give (1151.67 kg ha-1)”
e1“highest grain yield from Variety MH-97”
t0“Mungbean”
The same questions in other papers
density · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →density · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.