Paper · 2020 · Abstract book of the 2nd International Scientific Conference "Plants and Microbes: the Future of Biotechnology" PLAMIC2020

The intensity of root colonization by phytopathogenic fungus and rhizobacterium depends on the genotype of tomatoes and abscisic acid

D. S. Syrova; V. Y. Shakhnazarova; A. I. Shaposhnikov; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The intensity of root colonization by phytopathogenic fungus and rhizobacterium differs depending on the tomato genotype. Inoculation of wild-type tomatoes Ailsa Craig, but not of its ABA deficient mutant flacca, with Novosphingobium sp. P6W inhibits root colonization by Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root colonization by a fungus and rhizobacterium varies with tomato genotype.

Material
tomato genotypee0
Outcome
root colonizatione0
Direction
differse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intensity of root colonization by phytopathogenic fungus and rhizobacterium differs depending on the tomato genotype.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Novosphingobium sp. P6W inoculation inhibits Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284 root colonization in wild-type Ailsa Craig tomatoes.

Material
Ailsa Craige0
Treatment
Inoculation of wild-type tomatoes Ailsa Craig, but not of its ABA deficient mutant flacca, with Novosphingobium sp. P6We0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284Fusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Second interactor
Novosphingobium sp. P6WNovosphingobium sp. P6We0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root colonization by Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284e0
Direction
inhibitse0
Comparator
ABA deficient mutant flaccae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of wild-type tomatoes Ailsa Craig, but not of its ABA deficient mutant flacca, with Novosphingobium sp. P6W inhibits root colonization by Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial inoculation does not inhibit fungal root colonization in flacca tomatoes.

Material
flaccae0
Treatment
Inoculation of wild-type tomatoes Ailsa Craig, but not of its ABA deficient mutant flacca, with Novosphingobium sp. P6We0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284Fusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Second interactor
Novosphingobium sp. P6WNovosphingobium sp. P6We0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root colonization by Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284e0
Direction
note0
Comparator
Ailsa Craige0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of wild-type tomatoes Ailsa Craig, but not of its ABA deficient mutant flacca, with Novosphingobium sp. P6W inhibits root colonization by Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–299 · show in text ↑

loss of function · Fusarium oxysporum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium oxysporum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.