Abstract
The intensity of root colonization by phytopathogenic fungus and rhizobacterium differs depending on the tomato genotype. Inoculation of wild-type tomatoes Ailsa Craig, but not of its ABA deficient mutant flacca, with Novosphingobium sp. P6W inhibits root colonization by Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Root colonization by a fungus and rhizobacterium varies with tomato genotype.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- tomato genotypee0
- Outcome
- root colonizatione0
- Direction
- differse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The intensity of root colonization by phytopathogenic fungus and rhizobacterium differs depending on the tomato genotype.”
Claim · model-written summary
Novosphingobium sp. P6W inoculation inhibits Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284 root colonization in wild-type Ailsa Craig tomatoes.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- Ailsa Craige0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of wild-type tomatoes Ailsa Craig, but not of its ABA deficient mutant flacca, with Novosphingobium sp. P6We0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284
Fusarium oxysporume0pathogen - Second interactor
- Novosphingobium sp. P6WNovosphingobium sp. P6We0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root colonization by Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284e0
- Direction
- inhibitse0
- Comparator
- ABA deficient mutant flaccae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of wild-type tomatoes Ailsa Craig, but not of its ABA deficient mutant flacca, with Novosphingobium sp. P6W inhibits root colonization by Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284.”
Claim · model-written summary
The bacterial inoculation does not inhibit fungal root colonization in flacca tomatoes.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- flaccae0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of wild-type tomatoes Ailsa Craig, but not of its ABA deficient mutant flacca, with Novosphingobium sp. P6We0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284
Fusarium oxysporume0pathogen - Second interactor
- Novosphingobium sp. P6WNovosphingobium sp. P6We0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root colonization by Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284e0
- Direction
- note0
- Comparator
- Ailsa Craige0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_(Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._batatas)_1234227-PPT-Clemson_University.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of wild-type tomatoes Ailsa Craig, but not of its ABA deficient mutant flacca, with Novosphingobium sp. P6W inhibits root colonization by Fusarium oxysporum MF-G284.”
The same questions in other papers
loss of function · Fusarium oxysporum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · Fusarium oxysporum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.