Abstract
The article presents the results of studies of complex effect of biopreparations use during basic and pre-sowing soil tillage on root rot damage and leaf and stem infections of spring grain crops (wheat cv. Svecha, barley cv. Lel’, oats cv. Selma). Studies of 2010-2017 were carried out in seven-field crop rotation on sod-podzolic medium-loam soil. The root rot damage of spring wheat was significantly lower (17.9 %) by surface tillage than by ploughing (22.5 %) in arid conditions with insufficient productive moisture (9.1-17.2 mm) and an increase in soil density (1.37-1.43 g/cm 3 ). Under optimal humidification conditions, the differences in root rot damage of barley are equaled (21.3 and 22.4 %). High soil density (1.32-1.36 g/cm 3 ) also caused an increase in the number of diseased oat plants by surface tillage (21.6) compared to ploughing (14.6 %). Treatment of crops with the preparations Streptomyces castelarensis А4 and Pseudobacterin-2 in the tillering phase led to a significant decrease in root rot damage only on oats (by 17.1 and 17.4 %, respectively). The degree of damage of spring grain crops with leaf and stem diseases was not significantly affected by the methods of basic and pre-sowing tillage. Only the use of a combined sowing unit for cultivation of spring wheat reduced the damage with leaf rust by 2.9 %, with septoriosis – by 1.0% compared to the control. On wheat, the preparations were effective on the background of ploughing reducing leaf rust damage by 15.2 and 11.6 %. The preparation S. castelarensis А4 had a greater effect on barley: the number of plants affected by crown rust was 19.1% less. Pseudobacterin-2 had a better effect on the background of surface tillage, reducing the incidence by 12.9 % relative to the control (ploughing to 20-22 cm). On oat sowings, the preparations were comparable in effect: the intensity of crown rust damage was significantly lower by 5.0 and 4.7 % compared to the control. The action of S. castelarensis А4 is more effective on the background of surface soil tillage. Pseudobacterin-2 had the best effect by plowing. The damage of wheat with stem rust and septoriosis was low. Thus, the methods of basic tillage did not affect the damage of grain crops with leaf and stem diseases and significantly decreased the development of root rot in wheat and oats. Methods of pre-sowing tillage did not have a significant effect on the damage of spring grain crops with root rot and significantly reduced the damage of wheat with leaf rust and septoriosis. The preparations used reduced the intensity and the development of root rot of oats and leaf and stem diseases of wheat, barley, oats.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
The root rot damage of spring wheat was significantly lower (17.9 %) by surface tillage than by ploughing (22.5 %)
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- surface tillagee0
- Outcome
- root rot damagee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 17.9 %e0
- Comparator
- ploughinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The root rot damage of spring wheat was significantly lower (17.9 %) by surface tillage than by ploughing (22.5 %)”
Claim · model-written summary
Under optimal humidification conditions, the differences in root rot damage of barley are equaled (21.3 and 22.4 %)
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- surface tillagee1
- Outcome
- root rot damagee0
- Direction
- equalede0
- Value
- 21.3 and 22.4 %e0
- Comparator
- ploughinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Under optimal humidification conditions, the differences in root rot damage of barley are equaled (21.3 and 22.4 %)”
e1“The root rot damage of spring wheat was significantly lower (17.9 %) by surface tillage than by ploughing (22.5 %)”
Claim · model-written summary
High soil density (1.32-1.36 g/cm 3 ) also caused an increase in the number of diseased oat plants by surface tillage (21.6) compared to ploughing (14.6 %)
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativae0 - Treatment
- surface tillagee0
- Outcome
- number of diseased oat plantse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 21.6e0
- Comparator
- ploughinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“High soil density (1.32-1.36 g/cm 3 ) also caused an increase in the number of diseased oat plants by surface tillage (21.6) compared to ploughing (14.6 %)”
Claim · model-written summary
Streptomyces castelarensis А4 significantly decreased oat root rot damage.
- Taxon
- oatsAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- Streptomyces castelarensis А4e0
- Interactor
- Streptomyces castelarensis А4Streptomyces antimycoticuse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root rot damagee0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 17.1 and 17.4 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment of crops with the preparations Streptomyces castelarensis А4 and Pseudobacterin-2 in the tillering phase led to a significant decrease in root rot damage only on oats (by 17.1 and 17.4 %, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudobacterin-2 significantly decreased oat root rot damage.
- Taxon
- oatsAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- Pseudobacterin-2e0
- Interactor
- Pseudobacterin-2e0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root rot damagee0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 17.4 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatment of crops with the preparations Streptomyces castelarensis А4 and Pseudobacterin-2 in the tillering phase led to a significant decrease in root rot damage only on oats (by 17.1 and 17.4 %, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
The degree of damage of spring grain crops with leaf and stem diseases was not significantly affected by the methods of basic and pre-sowing tillage.
- Taxon
- spring grain cropse0
- Treatment
- methods of basic and pre-sowing tillagee0
- Outcome
- degree of damage of spring grain crops with leaf and stem diseasese0
- Direction
- not significantly affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The degree of damage of spring grain crops with leaf and stem diseases was not significantly affected by the methods of basic and pre-sowing tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Only the use of a combined sowing unit for cultivation of spring wheat reduced the damage with leaf rust by 2.9 %, with septoriosis – by 1.0% compared to the control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- combined sowing unite0
- Outcome
- damage with leaf ruste0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 2.9 %e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Only the use of a combined sowing unit for cultivation of spring wheat reduced the damage with leaf rust by 2.9 %, with septoriosis – by 1.0% compared to the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Only the use of a combined sowing unit for cultivation of spring wheat reduced the damage with leaf rust by 2.9 %, with septoriosis – by 1.0% compared to the control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- combined sowing unite0
- Outcome
- septoriosise0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 1.0%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Only the use of a combined sowing unit for cultivation of spring wheat reduced the damage with leaf rust by 2.9 %, with septoriosis – by 1.0% compared to the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
On wheat, the preparations were effective on the background of ploughing reducing leaf rust damage by 15.2 and 11.6 %.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- preparationse0
- Outcome
- leaf rust damagee0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 15.2 and 11.6 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On wheat, the preparations were effective on the background of ploughing reducing leaf rust damage by 15.2 and 11.6 %.”
Claim · model-written summary
The preparation S. castelarensis А4 had a greater effect on barley: the number of plants affected by crown rust was 19.1% less.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- S. castelarensis А4e0
- Outcome
- number of plants affected by crown ruste0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 19.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The preparation S. castelarensis А4 had a greater effect on barley: the number of plants affected by crown rust was 19.1% less.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudobacterin-2 had a better effect on the background of surface tillage, reducing the incidence by 12.9 % relative to the control (ploughing to 20-22 cm).
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Pseudobacterin-2 had a better effect on the background of surface tillage, reducing the incidence by 12.9 % relative to the control (ploughing to 20-22 cm).”
Claim · model-written summary
On oat sowings, the preparations were comparable in effect: the intensity of crown rust damage was significantly lower by 5.0 and 4.7 % compared to the control.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- preparationse0
- Outcome
- intensity of crown rust damagee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 5.0 and 4.7 %e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On oat sowings, the preparations were comparable in effect: the intensity of crown rust damage was significantly lower by 5.0 and 4.7 % compared to the control.”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →tillage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.