Paper · 2020 · E3S Web of Conferences

Lime soil conditioner based on soda production sludge for reclamation of industry-disturbed soils in the impact zone of an oil refinery

Elena Kalinina; Larisa Rudakova

10
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a study on the use of soda production sludge (SPS) as a lime soil conditioner. SPS with a less than 0.1 mm fraction is the most suitable in terms of physical, chemical, and toxicological properties and meets the requirements of GOST-14050-93 «Limestone (dolomite) dust. Specifications» on the content of the active substance, the mass fraction of calcium and magnesium carbonates. Reclamative properties of SPS were studied on soil samples taken in the territory removed from the sanitary protection zone of the oil refinery. It was found that all soil samples have a phytotoxic effect on pea seedlings. The introduction of SPS in amount of 1-3 g per kg of soil stimulates the development of the ground part and roots of oats and peas, and also increases the germination energy of oat and pea seeds in the initial soil samples by 2÷10 times. The introduction of SPS into the samples of the studied soils at a dose of 1-3 g/kg stimulates the development of colonies of Azotobacter bacteria and leads to an increase in the total number of soil microorganisms. The introduction of SPS in an amount of 3 g per kilo of soil leads to a slight increase in the environment reaction and an increase in the content of water-soluble salts in the soil up to 2 times. In view of this, it is necessary to control that the content of water-soluble salts does not exceed the established standards. Based on the results obtained, we consider it expedient to use soda production sludge as a lime soil conditioner and for the reclamation of industry-disturbed soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All sampled soils had a phytotoxic effect on pea seedlings.

Outcome
phytotoxic effect on pea seedlingse0
Setting
soil samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all soil samples have a phytotoxic effect on pea seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soda production sludge stimulated development of oat shoots and roots.

Treatment
SPS in amount of 1-3 g per kg of soile0
Outcome
development of the ground part and rootse0
Direction
stimulatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of SPS in amount of 1-3 g per kg of soil stimulates the development of the ground part and roots of oats and peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soda production sludge stimulated development of pea shoots and roots.

Treatment
SPS in amount of 1-3 g per kg of soile0
Outcome
development of the ground part and rootse0
Direction
stimulatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of SPS in amount of 1-3 g per kg of soil stimulates the development of the ground part and roots of oats and peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge increased oat seed germination energy by 2÷10 times.

Treatment
SPS in amount of 1-3 g per kg of soile0
Outcome
germination energy of oate0
Direction
increasese0
Value
2÷10 timese0
Comparator
initial soil samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of SPS in amount of 1-3 g per kg of soil stimulates the development of the ground part and roots of oats and peas, and also increases the germination energy of oat and pea seeds in the initial soil samples by 2÷10 times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge increased pea seed germination energy by 2÷10 times.

Treatment
SPS in amount of 1-3 g per kg of soile0
Outcome
germination energy of oat and pea seedse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
2÷10 timese0
Comparator
initial soil samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of SPS in amount of 1-3 g per kg of soil stimulates the development of the ground part and roots of oats and peas, and also increases the germination energy of oat and pea seeds in the initial soil samples by 2÷10 times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge stimulated Azotobacter colony development.

Treatment
SPS into the samples of the studied soils at a dose of 1-3 g/kge0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0other
Outcome
development of colonies of Azotobacter bacteriae0
Direction
stimulatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of SPS into the samples of the studied soils at a dose of 1-3 g/kg stimulates the development of colonies of Azotobacter bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1022 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots of oats and peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge increased the total number of soil microorganisms.

Treatment
SPS into the samples of the studied soils at a dose of 1-3 g/kge0
Outcome
total number of soil microorganismse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of SPS into the samples of the studied soils at a dose of 1-3 g/kg stimulates the development of colonies of Azotobacter bacteria and leads to an increase in the total number of soil microorganisms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1091 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge slightly increased soil reaction.

Treatment
SPS in an amount of 3 g per kilo of soile0
Outcome
environment reactione0
Direction
slight increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of SPS in an amount of 3 g per kilo of soil leads to a slight increase in the environment reaction and an increase in the content of water-soluble salts in the soil up to 2 times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1288 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge increased soil water-soluble salts up to twofold.

Treatment
SPS in an amount of 3 g per kilo of soile0
Outcome
content of water-soluble salts in the soile0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2 timese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of SPS in an amount of 3 g per kilo of soil leads to a slight increase in the environment reaction and an increase in the content of water-soluble salts in the soil up to 2 times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1288 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sludge as a lime soil conditioner for reclamation of industry-disturbed soils.

Outcome
use soda production sludge as a lime soil conditioner and for the reclamation of industry-disturbed soilse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“we consider it expedient to use soda production sludge as a lime soil conditioner and for the reclamation of industry-disturbed soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1580 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

organic · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.