Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Different Types of Soil on the Growth & Productivity of Tomato Solanum lycopersicum var. Rio Grande in Libya

Najia Shwerif; Abdunnapi Elghammudi; Samaher Abosnena; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The growth performance of plants varies in different environments and is strongly influenced by various biotic and abiotic factors. This, in turn affects the composition of the active compounds which are the product of metabolism (such as photosynthesis, respiration, etc.). Soil quality is considered to be important factor that negatively affect plant growth and productivity. Tomatoes are widely produced and consumed due to their high nutritional value and its important compounds have a role in the prevention of many diseases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effects of three different soil types (clay, sand and compost) on growth and yield parameters of tomato Solanum lycopersicum var.Rio Grande. The experiment was done on the Faculty of Science in Gharyan University (April 2017). The tomatoes were grown in pots; twelve replications were used for each group of soils. Growth parameters such as number of seedling, plant height, number of leaves and number of fruits were recorded. The results indicated that soil quality hada highly significant effect (P < 0.001) on growth parameters. Compost was the optimal soil types for growth performance and production of tomatoes, while the growth performance was reduced in clay and sand soil. By contrast, tomatoes that grew in clay soil showed the least growth performance. On the other hand, tomato plants cultivated in clay and sand soil failed in production of flowers and fruits, unlike tomatoes grown in compost. Overall, soil quality and properties have affected tomato growth performance and productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil quality significantly affected tomato growth parameters.

Treatment
soil qualitye0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Value
P < 0.001e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil quality hada highly significant effect (P < 0.001) on growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Solanum lycopersicum var. Rio Grande in Libya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost gave optimal tomato growth and production relative to clay and sand.

Treatment
Composte0
Outcome
growth performance and productione0
Direction
optimale0
Comparator
clay and sand soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost was the optimal soil types for growth performance and production of tomatoes, while the growth performance was reduced in clay and sand soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato growth performance was least in clay soil.

Treatment
clay soile0
Outcome
growth performancee0
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomatoes that grew in clay soil showed the least growth performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomatoes in clay soil produced no flowers or fruits, unlike compost-grown tomatoes.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
claye0
Outcome
flowers and fruitse0
Direction
failed in productione0
Comparator
composte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants cultivated in clay and sand soil failed in production of flowers and fruits, unlike tomatoes grown in compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomatoes in sand soil produced no flowers or fruits, unlike compost-grown tomatoes.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
sand soile0
Outcome
flowers and fruitse0
Direction
failed in productione0
Comparator
composte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants cultivated in clay and sand soil failed in production of flowers and fruits, unlike tomatoes grown in compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1494 · show in text ↑

growing medium · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.