Paper · 2001 · Biologia Plantarum

Effect of Benzylaminopurine on Rehydration of Bean Plants after Water Stress

J. Rulcová; J. Pospíšilová

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
57
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The possibility of improving the recovery of plant photosynthesis after water stress by cytokinin-induced stimulation of stomatal opening or delay of leaf senescence was tested. The 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) in concentrations 1 and 10 μM was applied to the substrate (sand + nutrient solution) or sprayed on primary leaves of 14-d-old Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants sufficiently supplied with water or water-stressed for 4 d. The later ones having relative water content decreased to 69 % were fully rehydrated during the following three days. Parameters of photosynthesis and water relations were measured in primary leaves of 7-, 10-, 14-, and 17-d-old plants. Application of 1 μM BAP slightly delayed leaf senescence: in 17-d-old control plants, net photosynthetic rate (PN) and chlorophyll (Chl) content, and when sprayed on leaves also some of Chl a fluorescence kinetic parameters of BAP-treated leaves were slightly higher than those of untreated leaves. Both types of application of 1 μM BAP slightly improved recovery of plants during rehydration after water stress in terms of increased gad, gab and PN, i.e., parameters which were markedly decreased by mild water stress. However, contents of Chl a, Chl b and carotenoids and parameters of Chl a fluorescence kinetic were not markedly affected by mild water stress and after rehydration were not stimulated by 1 μM BAP. 10 μM BAP had mostly negative effects on the parameters measured.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1 μM, BAP slightly delayed leaf senescence in control bean plants.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
1 μM BAPe0
Outcome
leaf senescencee0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 1 μM BAP slightly delayed leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–717 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 17-day-old controls, BAP-treated leaves had slightly higher net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content than untreated leaves.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
BAP-treatede0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (PN) and chlorophyll (Chl) contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 17-d-old control plants, net photosynthetic rate (PN) and chlorophyll (Chl) content, and when sprayed on leaves also some of Chl a fluorescence kinetic parameters of BAP-treated leaves were slightly higher than those of untreated leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–958 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed BAP-treated leaves also had slightly higher chlorophyll a fluorescence kinetic parameters than untreated leaves.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
BAP-treatede0
Outcome
Chl a fluorescence kinetic parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when sprayed on leaves also some of Chl a fluorescence kinetic parameters of BAP-treated leaves were slightly higher than those of untreated leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–958 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both 1 μM BAP application routes slightly increased stomatal conductance parameters and net photosynthetic rate during rehydration after water stress.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
1 μM BAPe0
Outcome
gad, gab and PNe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
during rehydration after water stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both types of application of 1 μM BAP slightly improved recovery of plants during rehydration after water stress in terms of increased gad, gab and PN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild water stress markedly decreased gad, gab and PN.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
mild water stresse0
Outcome
gad, gab and PNe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gad, gab and PN, i.e., parameters which were markedly decreased by mild water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1179 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild water stress did not markedly affect chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b or carotenoid contents or chlorophyll a fluorescence kinetics.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
mild water stresse0
Outcome
contents of Chl a, Chl b and carotenoidse0
Direction
not markedly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contents of Chl a, Chl b and carotenoids and parameters of Chl a fluorescence kinetic were not markedly affected by mild water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1323 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After rehydration, 1 μM BAP did not stimulate pigment contents or chlorophyll a fluorescence kinetics.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
1 μM BAPe0
Outcome
parameters of Chl a fluorescence kinetice0
Direction
not stimulatede0
Qualifier
after rehydratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contents of Chl a, Chl b and carotenoids and parameters of Chl a fluorescence kinetic were not markedly affected by mild water stress and after rehydration were not stimulated by 1 μM BAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1377 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 μM, BAP had mostly negative effects on measured parameters.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
10 μM BAPe0
Outcome
parameters measurede0
Direction
negative effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 μM BAP had mostly negative effects on the parameters measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1443 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–363 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

N-benzyladenine · quality: postharvest · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 2 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.