Abstract
[EN] Two hybrids, "UPV-FA" and "UPV-FMy", hereinafter "Fian" and "Fimy", were obtained by crossing the wild Cucumis species C. ficifolius with C. anguria and C. myriocarpus, respectively. These species are known to be resistant to nematodes. The hybrids have been tested against the main melon soil borne and aerial fungal pathogens. Both were highly resistant to Macrophomina phaseolina and to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis (Fom) race 1.2 (wilting isolate), and moderately resistant to Fom 1.2 (yellowing isolate) and to Monosporascus cannonballus. "Fimy" was highly resistant to powdery mildew races 2 and 5, and "Fian" was highly and moderately resistant to these races, respectively. These hybrids were previously evaluated as rootstocks for melon in greenhouses and experimental fields with good results (adequate compatibility, growth development and production, and no negative impact on fruit quality). This behavior was now confirmed in commercial fields. The same grafting combinations were used: as scion the muskmelon cultivar "Vendrantais", a Charentais type, and the cultivar "Finura", a Piel de Sapo type, and as rootstocks "Fian", "Fimy" and two commercial rootstocks "Cobalt" (Cucumis maxima × Cucumis moschata) and "64-376" (Cucumis melo). As in previous assays, fruit from plants grafted onto "Cobalt" yielded larger fruits, with wider seminal cavities. In fruit harvested from plants grafted onto "Fian", "Fimy" or onto the other Cucumis rootstock some mild differences that do not affect the market quality of fruit were found. All these results confirm the suitability of both hybrids as rootstocks for melon: they show good grafting performance, with reduced impact on fruit quality compared to Cucurbita rootstocks, and better resistance to the fungal pathogens that limit melon production worldwide.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Fian was highly resistant to Macrophomina phaseolina.
- Material
- Fiant0
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen - Outcome
- highly resistante0
CucumisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both were highly resistant to Macrophomina phaseolina and to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis (Fom) race 1.2 (wilting isolate)”
t0“Interspecific hybrids of wild Cucumis species (‘Fian’ and ‘Fimy’)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fimy was highly resistant to Macrophomina phaseolina.
- Material
- Fimyt0
- Interactor
- Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
- Outcome
- highly resistante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both were highly resistant to Macrophomina phaseolina and to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis (Fom) race 1.2 (wilting isolate)”
t0“Interspecific hybrids of wild Cucumis species (‘Fian’ and ‘Fimy’)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fian was highly resistant to the wilting isolate of Fom race 1.2.
- Material
- Fiant0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis (Fom) race 1.2
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonise0pathogen - Outcome
- highly resistante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both were highly resistant to Macrophomina phaseolina and to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis (Fom) race 1.2 (wilting isolate)”
t0“Interspecific hybrids of wild Cucumis species (‘Fian’ and ‘Fimy’)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fimy was highly resistant to the wilting isolate of Fom race 1.2.
- Material
- Fimyt0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis (Fom) race 1.2Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonise0pathogen
- Outcome
- highly resistante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both were highly resistant to Macrophomina phaseolina and to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis (Fom) race 1.2 (wilting isolate)”
t0“Interspecific hybrids of wild Cucumis species (‘Fian’ and ‘Fimy’)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fian was moderately resistant to the yellowing isolate of Fom 1.2.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“moderately resistant to Fom 1.2 (yellowing isolate) and to Monosporascus cannonballus”
t0“Interspecific hybrids of wild Cucumis species (‘Fian’ and ‘Fimy’)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fimy was moderately resistant to the yellowing isolate of Fom 1.2.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“moderately resistant to Fom 1.2 (yellowing isolate) and to Monosporascus cannonballus”
t0“Interspecific hybrids of wild Cucumis species (‘Fian’ and ‘Fimy’)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fian was moderately resistant to Monosporascus cannonballus.
- Material
- Fiant0
- Interactor
- Monosporascus cannonballusMonosporascus cannonballuse0pathogen
- Outcome
- moderately resistante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“moderately resistant to Fom 1.2 (yellowing isolate) and to Monosporascus cannonballus”
t0“Interspecific hybrids of wild Cucumis species (‘Fian’ and ‘Fimy’)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fimy was moderately resistant to Monosporascus cannonballus.
- Material
- Fimyt0
- Interactor
- Monosporascus cannonballusMonosporascus cannonballuse0pathogen
- Outcome
- moderately resistante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“moderately resistant to Fom 1.2 (yellowing isolate) and to Monosporascus cannonballus”
t0“Interspecific hybrids of wild Cucumis species (‘Fian’ and ‘Fimy’)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fimy was highly resistant to powdery mildew races 2 and 5.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“"Fimy" was highly resistant to powdery mildew races 2 and 5”
t0“wild Cucumis species”
Claim · model-written summary
Fian was highly resistant to powdery mildew race 2.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“"Fian" was highly and moderately resistant to these races, respectively”
e1“"Fimy" was highly resistant to powdery mildew races 2 and 5”
t0“wild Cucumis species”
Claim · model-written summary
Fian was moderately resistant to powdery mildew race 5.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“"Fian" was highly and moderately resistant to these races, respectively”
e1“"Fimy" was highly resistant to powdery mildew races 2 and 5”
t0“wild Cucumis species”
Claim · model-written summary
Commercial fields confirmed good grafting performance of the hybrid rootstocks.
- Taxon
- melon
.jpg?width=60)
Cucumis melot0 - Outcome
- good grafting performancee1
- Setting
- commercial fieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“This behavior was now confirmed in commercial fields”
e1“they show good grafting performance”
t0“rootstocks for melon”
Claim · model-written summary
Cobalt rootstocks produced larger fruits.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Treatment
- grafted onto "Cobalt"e0
- Outcome
- fruitse0
- Direction
- largere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit from plants grafted onto "Cobalt" yielded larger fruits”
t0“rootstocks for melon”
Claim · model-written summary
Cobalt rootstocks produced wider seminal cavities.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Treatment
- grafted onto "Cobalt"e0
- Outcome
- seminal cavitiese0
- Direction
- widere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit from plants grafted onto "Cobalt" yielded larger fruits, with wider seminal cavities”
t0“rootstocks for melon”
Claim · model-written summary
Fian rootstocks caused mild fruit differences without affecting market quality.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Treatment
- grafted onto "Fian"e0
- Outcome
- market quality of fruite0
- Direction
- do not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit harvested from plants grafted onto "Fian", "Fimy" or onto the other Cucumis rootstock some mild differences that do not affect the market quality of fruit were found”
t0“rootstocks for melon”
Claim · model-written summary
Fimy rootstocks caused mild fruit differences without affecting market quality.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis melot0
- Treatment
- "Fimy"e0
- Outcome
- market quality of fruite0
- Direction
- do not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit harvested from plants grafted onto "Fian", "Fimy" or onto the other Cucumis rootstock some mild differences that do not affect the market quality of fruit were found”
t0“rootstocks for melon”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors consider both hybrids suitable rootstocks with reduced fruit-quality impact and better fungal resistance.
- Taxon
- melonCucumis meloe0
- Outcome
- suitability of both hybrids as rootstocks for melone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All these results confirm the suitability of both hybrids as rootstocks for melon: they show good grafting performance, with reduced impact on fruit quality compared to Cucurbita rootstocks, and better resistance to the fungal pathogens that limit melon production worldwide”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →grafting · quality: general · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.