Paper · 2020 · Semina Ciências Agrárias

Response of the common bean to liquid fertilizer and Rhizobium tropici inoculation

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, EMBRAPA Arroz e Feijão; José Geraldo da Silva; Enderson Petrônio de Brito Ferreira; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The common bean production system is majorly based on the use of granular fertilizers to provide nutrients for the crop. Studies on the use of liquid fertilization at an appropriated depth and, seed inoculation with Rhizobium tropici can provide significant increases in the grain yield of the common bean. The objective of this study was to determine the growth and productivity of common bean as affected by N-P formulations, application depths and the inoculation with R. tropici. Field experiments were carried out in 2015 and 2016 cropping years using a complete block design, in a 2x2x2 factorial arrangement, with four replicates. The treatments involved the combination of N-P formulation (granular and liquid), two application depths of the N-P formulation (6 and 12 cm) and with or without rhizobia inoculant. The plant density (PD), number of pods (NP), number of grains (NG), mass of 100 grains (M100) and grain yield (GY) were determined. The granular and liquid N-P formulations provided similar results for PD, NP, NG, and GY of common bean. Similarly, the application depth of the N-P formulations did not affect GY. Inoculation of the seed with R. tropici stimulated NP and NG, increasing GY. Growth and productivity parameters were equally affected by the type of formulation and application depth; however, GY was greater with rhizobial inoculant. Thus, the liquid N-P formulation, applied at 6 cm depth, associated with rhizobial inoculant can improve the crop management providing better control of application uniformity, minimal soil mobilization, less fuel consumption, and increased grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular and liquid N-P formulations gave similar plant density, number of pods and number of grains in common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
liquid N-P formulationse0
Outcome
PD, NP, NGe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
granulare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The granular and liquid N-P formulations provided similar results for PD, NP, NG, and GY of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular and liquid N-P formulations gave similar grain yield in common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
liquid N-P formulationse0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
granulare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The granular and liquid N-P formulations provided similar results for PD, NP, NG, and GY of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The application depth of the N-P formulations did not affect grain yield of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
application depth of the N-P formulationse0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“the application depth of the N-P formulations did not affect GY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with R. tropici stimulated the number of pods and number of grains of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Inoculation of the seed with R. tropicie0
Interactor
R. tropiciMartinezella tropicie0symbiont
Outcome
NP and NGe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Martinezella tropici
Martinezella tropici · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation of the seed with R. tropici stimulated NP and NG, increasing GY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with R. tropici increased grain yield of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Inoculation of the seed with R. tropicie0
Interactor
R. tropiciMartinezella tropicie0symbiont
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Martinezella tropici
Martinezella tropici · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation of the seed with R. tropici stimulated NP and NG, increasing GY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1208 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that liquid N-P formulation applied at 6 cm depth together with rhizobial inoculant can improve crop management, with better application uniformity, minimal soil mobilization, less fuel consumption and increased grain yield.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Interactor
rhizobial inoculante0symbiont
Outcome
crop managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–27 · show in text ↑
e0

“the liquid N-P formulation, applied at 6 cm depth, associated with rhizobial inoculant can improve the crop management providing better control of application uniformity, minimal soil mobilization, less fuel consumption, and increased grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1619 · show in text ↑

Martinezella tropici · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.