Paper · 2020 · Plants

Impact of Seed Dressing and Soil Application of Potassium Humate on Cotton Plants Productivity and Fiber Quality

Asmat Ullah; Muqarrab Ali; Khurram Shahzad; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Humus is the stable form of added crop and animal residues. The organic matter after a long-term decomposition process converts into humic substances. The naturally occurring humus is present in less amount in soils of the arid and semi-arid regions. The addition of commercially available humic acid can, therefore, contribute to improving soil health and crop yields. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of potassium humate, applied through soil seed dressing, on cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes. Seed dressing with potassium humate was done at the rate of 0, 100, 150 and 200 mL kg−1 seed while in soil potassium humate was applied at the rate of 0, 10, 20 and 30 L ha−1. Results showed that the combined application of potassium humate by seed dressing and through soil application improved the soil properties, productivity and fiber quality traits of cotton. All levels of soil applied potassium humate (10, 20 and 30 L ha−1) performed better over seed dressing in terms of cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes. Among the soil application rates, 20 L ha−1 potassium humate proved better as compared to other rates (0, 10 and 30 L ha−1). Higher soil application of potassium humate (30 L ha−1) showed depressing effects on all the traits studied like the reduction of 12.4% and 6.6% in Ginning out turn and fiber length, respectively, at a seeding dressing of 200 mL kg−1. In conclusion, potassium humate seed dressing and soil application at the rate of 200 mL kg−1 and 20 L ha−1, respectively, is a better approach to improve cotton productivity. Soil potassium humate should not exceed a rate of 20 L ha−1 when the seed dressing of potassium is also practiced.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined seed dressing and soil application of potassium humate improved soil properties, productivity and fiber quality of cotton.

Treatment
combined application of potassium humate by seed dressing and through soil applicatione1
Outcome
soil properties, productivity and fiber quality traitse1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–533 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combined application of potassium humate by seed dressing and through soil application improved the soil properties, productivity and fiber quality traits of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All soil-applied potassium humate levels (10, 20 and 30 L ha−1) performed better than seed dressing for cotton productivity and fiber quality.

Treatment
soil applied potassium humate (10, 20 and 30 L ha−1)e2
Outcome
cotton productivity and fiber quality attributese2
Direction
performed bettere2
Comparator
seed dressinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–533 · show in text ↑
e2

“All levels of soil applied potassium humate (10, 20 and 30 L ha−1) performed better over seed dressing in terms of cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among soil rates, 20 L ha−1 potassium humate proved better than the other rates.

Treatment
20 L ha−1 potassium humatee3
Outcome
proved bettere3
Direction
proved bettere3
Comparator
other rates (0, 10 and 30 L ha−1)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–533 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among the soil application rates, 20 L ha−1 potassium humate proved better as compared to other rates (0, 10 and 30 L ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher soil application of potassium humate (30 L ha−1) depressed all the traits studied.

Treatment
Higher soil application of potassium humate (30 L ha−1)e4
Outcome
all the traits studiede4
Direction
depressing effectse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–533 · show in text ↑
e4

“Higher soil application of potassium humate (30 L ha−1) showed depressing effects on all the traits studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed dressing at 200 mL kg−1 with the higher soil rate reduced ginning out turn by 12.4%.

Treatment
seeding dressing of 200 mL kg−1e5
Outcome
Ginning out turne5
Direction
reductione5
Value
12.4%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–533 · show in text ↑
e5

“like the reduction of 12.4% and 6.6% in Ginning out turn and fiber length, respectively, at a seeding dressing of 200 mL kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed dressing at 200 mL kg−1 with the higher soil rate reduced fiber length by 6.6%.

Treatment
seeding dressing of 200 mL kg−1e5
Outcome
fiber lengthe5
Direction
reductione5
Value
6.6%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–533 · show in text ↑
e5

“like the reduction of 12.4% and 6.6% in Ginning out turn and fiber length, respectively, at a seeding dressing of 200 mL kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1424 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium humate seed dressing at 200 mL kg−1 combined with soil application at 20 L ha−1 is a better approach to improve cotton productivity.

Treatment
potassium humate seed dressing and soil application at the rate of 200 mL kg−1 and 20 L ha−1e6
Outcome
cotton productivitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–533 · show in text ↑
e6

“potassium humate seed dressing and soil application at the rate of 200 mL kg−1 and 20 L ha−1, respectively, is a better approach to improve cotton productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1600 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil potassium humate should not exceed 20 L ha−1 when potassium seed dressing is also practiced.

Outcome
should not exceed a rate of 20 L ha−1e7
Qualifier
when the seed dressing of potassium is also practicede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on cotton productivity and fiber quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–533 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil potassium humate should not exceed a rate of 20 L ha−1 when the seed dressing of potassium is also practiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1715 · show in text ↑

potassium · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

57 papers: 44 positive, 13 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

seed treatment · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 58 positive, 19 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.