Paper · 2015 · Egyptian Journal of Horticulture

Improving Bunch and Berry Quality of Crimson Seedless Grape CV. Using Gibberellic Acid

14
claims
32
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AFIELD experiment was carried out through two successive ……seasons of 2012 and 2013 on 8- years- old Crimson Seedless vine grown at 2.5 x 1.5 m apart in clay soil under drip irrigation system in a private vineyard located in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. Grapevines were sprayed with GA3 at 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l at full bloom (80 % calyptra fall) to evaluate the effect of GA3 as a thinning agent instead of hand thinning. The obtained results markedly reveal that number of berries /bunch, bunch weight, yield/ vine, bunch compactness and berry compression force were significantly reduced with increasing GA 3 concentration. As an average of both seasons, number of berries/ bunch was decreased by 43.92, 62.44, 69.98 and 80.22 % as a result of spraying vines with GA3 at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l, respectively in comparison with the control treatment. The corresponding reduction percentage in yield/ vine was 33.77, 54.25, 61.75 and 70.9 %, respectively. In contrast, weight of 100 berries, berry removal force were obviously increased with increasing GA3 concentrations in both seasons, due, mainly, to increasing thinning level. Total soluble solid percentage (TSS%) and TSS/acid ratio were significantly increased as a result of GA 3 spraying treatments without significant differences between the tested concentrations in most cases, whereas total acidity percentages were reduced as compared with unsprayed vines in both seasons. The obtained result of this study reveal that spraying GA 3 at 0.5 mg/l at full bloom was the optimum treatment for Crimson Seedless berry thinning, since this treatment obviously improved bunch and berry physical and chemical characteristics, as well as packable yield of tested table grape cv. without higher reduction in number of berries/ bunch, as well as yield and bunch weights as compared with the other tested GA3 concentrations and control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 reduced berries per bunch as concentration increased.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA 3 concentratione0
Outcome
number of berries /bunche0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of berries /bunch, bunch weight, yield/ vine, bunch compactness and berry compression force were significantly reduced with increasing GA 3 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 reduced bunch weight, yield, compactness and compression force with increasing concentration.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA 3 concentratione0
Outcome
bunch weight, yield/ vine, bunch compactness and berry compression forcee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of berries /bunch, bunch weight, yield/ vine, bunch compactness and berry compression force were significantly reduced with increasing GA 3 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 0.5 mg/l reduced berries per bunch by 43.92%.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3 at 0.5e0
Outcome
number of berries/ bunche0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
43.92e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“number of berries/ bunch was decreased by 43.92, 62.44, 69.98 and 80.22 % as a result of spraying vines with GA3 at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l, respectively in comparison with the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 1.0 mg/l reduced berries per bunch by 62.44%.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
1.0e0
Outcome
number of berries/ bunche0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
62.44e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“number of berries/ bunch was decreased by 43.92, 62.44, 69.98 and 80.22 % as a result of spraying vines with GA3 at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l, respectively in comparison with the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 2.0 mg/l reduced berries per bunch by 69.98%.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
2.0e0
Outcome
number of berries/ bunche0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
69.98e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“number of berries/ bunch was decreased by 43.92, 62.44, 69.98 and 80.22 % as a result of spraying vines with GA3 at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l, respectively in comparison with the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 4.0 mg/l reduced berries per bunch by 80.22%.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
4.0 mg/le0
Outcome
number of berries/ bunche0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
80.22 %e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“number of berries/ bunch was decreased by 43.92, 62.44, 69.98 and 80.22 % as a result of spraying vines with GA3 at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l, respectively in comparison with the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield per vine fell 33.77% at the first GA3 rate.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3e1
Outcome
yield/ vinee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
33.77e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding reduction percentage in yield/ vine was 33.77, 54.25, 61.75 and 70.9 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grapevines were sprayed with GA3 at 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l at full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield per vine fell 54.25% at the second GA3 rate.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3e1
Outcome
yield/ vinee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
54.25e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding reduction percentage in yield/ vine was 33.77, 54.25, 61.75 and 70.9 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grapevines were sprayed with GA3 at 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l at full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield per vine fell 61.75% at the third GA3 rate.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3e1
Outcome
yield/ vinee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
61.75e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding reduction percentage in yield/ vine was 33.77, 54.25, 61.75 and 70.9 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grapevines were sprayed with GA3 at 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l at full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield per vine fell 70.9% at the fourth GA3 rate.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3e1
Outcome
yield/ vinee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
70.9 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding reduction percentage in yield/ vine was 33.77, 54.25, 61.75 and 70.9 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grapevines were sprayed with GA3 at 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l at full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher GA3 concentrations increased berry weight and removal force.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3 concentrationse0
Outcome
weight of 100 berries, berry removal forcee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“weight of 100 berries, berry removal force were obviously increased with increasing GA3 concentrations in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 increased TSS and TSS to acid ratio.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA 3 spraying treatmentse0
Outcome
Total soluble solid percentage (TSS%) and TSS/acid ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total soluble solid percentage (TSS%) and TSS/acid ratio were significantly increased as a result of GA 3 spraying treatments without significant differences between the tested concentrations in most cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 lowered total acidity relative to unsprayed vines.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3e1
Outcome
total acidity percentagese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
unsprayed vinese0

Verbatim

e0

“total acidity percentages were reduced as compared with unsprayed vines in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grapevines were sprayed with GA3 at 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/l at full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–334 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 0.5 mg/l GA3 at full bloom as optimal for thinning.

Taxon
Crimson Seedlesse0
Outcome
optimum treatment for Crimson Seedless berry thinninge0

Verbatim

e0

“spraying GA 3 at 0.5 mg/l at full bloom was the optimum treatment for Crimson Seedless berry thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1597 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.