Paper · 2015 · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

RESPONSE OF MULTIPLE GENERATIONS OF TOBACCO CATERPILLAR SPODOPTERA LITURA FAB, FEEDING ON PEANUT, TO ELEVATED CO2

Srinivasa Rao; M * -Manimanjari; M. -Rama Rao; et al.

10
claims
50
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Changes in quality of host plants under elevated CO 2 (eCO 2 ) conditions likely in future can affect the survival, growth and development, and population dynamics of insect herbivores. The present study aimed to examine the effects of eCO 2 on leaf quality of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and consequent effects on growth characteristics of leaf feeding tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) over four successive generations. The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration. Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage. Larvae fed with eCO 2 foliage exhibited longer larval duration, higher larval weights and increased consumption in all four generations. Increased Approximate Digestibility (AD) (about 9%) and Relative Consumption Rate (RCR) (7%), decreased levels of efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) (13%), efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) (19%), and relative growth rate (RGR) (9%) were noticed in larvae fed eCO 2 foliage. Significant and cumulative effect of CO 2 on S.litura was observed over four successive generations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 lowered peanut leaf nitrogen.

Treatment
eCO 2e0
Outcome
leaf nitrogene0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ambient CO 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“SPODOPTERA LITURA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised peanut leaf carbon.

Treatment
eCO 2e0
Outcome
carbone0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“SPODOPTERA LITURA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised peanut leaf carbon to nitrogen ratio.

Treatment
eCO 2e0
Outcome
relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“SPODOPTERA LITURA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised peanut leaf polyphenols content.

Treatment
eCO 2e0
Outcome
polyphenols contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“SPODOPTERA LITURA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Caterpillars on elevated CO2 foliage had longer larval duration, higher weight and consumption across four generations.

Treatment
eCO 2 foliagee0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat1herbivore
Outcome
larval duration, higher larval weights and increased consumptione0
Direction
longere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Larvae fed with eCO 2 foliage exhibited longer larval duration, higher larval weights and increased consumption in all four generations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“SPODOPTERA LITURA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Approximate digestibility increased about 9% in larvae on elevated CO2 foliage.

Treatment
eCO 2 foliagee0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat1herbivore
Outcome
Approximate Digestibility (AD)e0
Direction
Increasede0
Value
about 9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased Approximate Digestibility (AD) (about 9%) and Relative Consumption Rate (RCR) (7%), decreased levels of efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) (13%), efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) (19%), and relative growth rate (RGR) (9%) were noticed in larvae fed eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“SPODOPTERA LITURA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative consumption rate increased 7%.

Treatment
eCO 2 foliagee0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat1herbivore
Outcome
Relative Consumption Rate (RCR)e0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased Approximate Digestibility (AD) (about 9%) and Relative Consumption Rate (RCR) (7%), decreased levels of efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) (13%), efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) (19%), and relative growth rate (RGR) (9%) were noticed in larvae fed eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“SPODOPTERA LITURA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficiency of conversion of ingested food decreased 13%.

Treatment
eCO 2 foliagee2
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat1herbivore
Outcome
efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased levels of efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) (13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“SPODOPTERA LITURA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficiency of conversion of digested food decreased 19%.

Treatment
eCO 2 foliagee2
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat1herbivore
Outcome
efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD)e0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) (19%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“SPODOPTERA LITURA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate decreased 9%.

Treatment
eCO 2 foliagee0
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat1herbivore
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative growth rate (RGR) (9%) were noticed in larvae fed eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“SPODOPTERA LITURA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The feeding trials were conducted using peanut foliage grown in open top chambers (OTCs) under two eCO 2 (550 ppm and 700 ppm) concentrations and one ambient CO 2 concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly lower leaf nitrogen, higher carbon, higher relative proportion of carbon to nitrogen (C: N) and higher polyphenols content were observed in eCO 2 foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–786 · show in text ↑

co2 · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.