Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Combined Effects of Induced Water Deficit and Foliar Application of Silicon on the Gas Exchange of Tomatoes for Processing

Diogo Henrique Morato de Moraes; Marcio Mesquita; Amanda Magalhães Bueno; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The beneficial effects of silicon (Si) on plants have been widely reported for its fruit qualitative improvements, growth gains, and protection against abiotic and biotic stresses. This study aimed to evaluate the combined effect of soil water potential (Ψs) (−30 and −60 kPa) and the foliar application of Si (0.0 (control), 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 g L−1) in the development of tomatoes grown in a greenhouse. We evaluated the biometric parameters and gas exchange in three periods (20, 34, and 48 days after planting). The rates of transpiration (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and net photosynthesis assimilation (An) were lower when the plants were subjected to water deficit. The foliar application of Si attenuated the effect of the water deficit in both levels applied to the crop. A high response was observed at −60 kPa, regardless of the evaluated period. However, a significant effect was not observed on the relative chlorophyll index and biomass accumulation when Si was applied. A foliar application up to 2.8 g L−1 promotes increases in An,gs, and E. It is highlighted that Si can promote improvements in gas exchange when plants are affected by a water deficit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit lowered tomato transpiration, stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
transpiration (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and net photosynthesis assimilation (An)e0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rates of transpiration (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and net photosynthesis assimilation (An) were lower when the plants were subjected to water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon attenuated water-deficit effects at both applied deficit levels.

Treatment
foliar application of Sie0
Outcome
effect of the water deficite0
Direction
attenuatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of Si attenuated the effect of the water deficit in both levels applied to the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response at −60 kPa was high regardless of evaluation period.

Treatment
−60 kPae0
Outcome
high responsee0
Qualifier
regardless of the evaluated periode0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A high response was observed at −60 kPa, regardless of the evaluated period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon had no significant effect on the relative chlorophyll index.

Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
relative chlorophyll indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant effect was not observed on the relative chlorophyll index and biomass accumulation when Si was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon had no significant effect on biomass accumulation.

Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant effect was not observed on the relative chlorophyll index and biomass accumulation when Si was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon up to 2.8 g L−1 increased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration.

Treatment
foliar application up to 2.8 g L−1e0
Outcome
An,gs, and Ee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A foliar application up to 2.8 g L−1 promotes increases in An,gs, and E.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 41 positive, 3 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 6 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.