Abstract
The present experiment was carried out during December 2018 to May 2019 in Central Research Field, Department of Horticulture, SHUATS, Prayagraj. it is concluded that treatment T2 (20 cm pruning) was best in terms of vegetative growth parameters like plant height, plant spread, number of branches etc. and treatment T4 (40 cm pruning) was best in terms of earliness and fruit yield parameters, in terms of quality treatment T3 (30 cm pruning) was best. In terms of economics treatment T4 (40 cm pruning) recorded maximum benefit and cost benefit ratio.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
20 cm pruning was best for vegetative growth.
- Taxon
- Pomegranate
Punica granatumt0 - Treatment
- T2 (20 cm pruning)e0
- Outcome
- plant height, plant spread, number of branchese0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T2 (20 cm pruning) was best in terms of vegetative growth parameters like plant height, plant spread, number of branches etc.”
t0“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
40 cm pruning was best for earliness and fruit yield.
- Taxon
- PomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Treatment
- T4 (40 cm pruning)e0
- Outcome
- earliness and fruit yield parameterse0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T4 (40 cm pruning) was best in terms of earliness and fruit yield parameters”
t0“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
30 cm pruning was best for quality.
- Taxon
- PomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Treatment
- T3 (30 cm pruning)e0
- Outcome
- qualitye0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in terms of quality treatment T3 (30 cm pruning) was best.”
t0“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
40 cm pruning maximized economic benefit and cost benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- PomegranatePunica granatumt0
- Treatment
- T4 (40 cm pruning)e0
- Outcome
- benefit and cost benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T4 (40 cm pruning) recorded maximum benefit and cost benefit ratio.”
t0“Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.