Paper · 2007 · The Korean Journal of Mycology

A Natural Fungus-derived Elicitor for Induction of Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) in Potato

Park, Hae-Jun; Kim, Hong-Gi

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

식물에 대해 병원성균이 아닌 자연계에서 존재하는 진균류로 부터 세포벽 성분을 분리하여 식물의 유도 저항성을 유도하는 엘리시터로써의 가능성을 시험하였다. 그 결과 선발된 진균 세포벽 성분이 감자에서 종래 알려진 어떤 엘리시터 보다도 아주 낮은 농도처리에서도 활성산소와 파이토알렉신 생성을 다량 유도하였다. 뿐 만 아니라 감자괴경을 이용한 병저항성 생물검정에서도 우수한 유도저항성이 발현되었음을 확인하였다. 그러므로 자연에서 분리된 일반적인 균주의 세포벽물질 엘리시터도 식물체의 유도저항성을 효과적으로 유도할 수 있는 새로운 식물병방제제로서의 개발 가능성이 있음을 시사하였다. It was investigated that systemic acquired resistance (SAR) was induced in plant treated with a elicitor, which was derived from a non-virulent fungus. The elicitor, a hyphal cell wall component derived from fungus, induced a production of phytoalexin and a generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in potato treated with its low level concentrations. The effect of the fungus-derived elicitor was better than that of virulent pathogen-derived elicitor, which was well known in potato. These results, therefore, suggested potentcial use of fungus-derived elicitor as a new plant protector for commercial development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungus-derived elicitor induced phytoalexin production in potato at low concentrations.

Treatment
elicitore0
Outcome
production of phytoalexine0
Direction
inducede0
Qualifier
low level concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The elicitor, a hyphal cell wall component derived from fungus, induced a production of phytoalexin and a generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in potato treated with its low level concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungus-derived elicitor induced reactive oxygen species in potato at low concentrations.

Treatment
elicitore0
Outcome
generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)e0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The elicitor, a hyphal cell wall component derived from fungus, induced a production of phytoalexin and a generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in potato treated with its low level concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungus-derived elicitor performed better than the virulent pathogen-derived elicitor in potato.

Treatment
fungus-derived elicitore0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
virulent pathogen-derived elicitore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effect of the fungus-derived elicitor was better than that of virulent pathogen-derived elicitor, which was well known in potato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato tuber bioassays confirmed strong induced disease resistance.

Outcome
유도저항성이e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“감자괴경을 이용한 병저항성 생물검정에서도 우수한 유도저항성이 발현되었음을 확인하였다.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–225 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the fungus-derived elicitor may be useful as a plant protector.

Outcome
use of fungus-derived elicitor as a new plant protectore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“These results, therefore, suggested potentcial use of fungus-derived elicitor as a new plant protector for commercial development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–940 · show in text ↑

resistance inducer · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

resistance inducer · physiology: oxidative · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.