Paper · 2020 · Enfoque UTE

Mass trapping of Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) using light and sex-pheromone traps in cotton

Muhammad Arshad; Muhammad Irfan Ullah; Muhammad Wasim Abbas; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is an important insect pest of the cotton crop worldwide. Sex-pheromone and light traps were used to monitor the adult P. gossypiella population in Bt cotton field for the years 2017-18 at southern Punjab, Pakistan. The sampling of infested bolls was done to record the damage level of P. gossypiella. The sex-pheromone traps captured approximately 2-3 times more adults than light traps in all locations during 2017-18. For sex-pheromone traps, temperature showed negative and strong relation (R2 = 0.63-0.80) with trap catches. Fewer bolls (7.0-9.0%) were infested in plots where sex-pheromone traps were installed compared to check plots (32-37%). Therefore, the pheromone trapping proved an effective and eco-friendly tool for the monitoring and management of P. gossypiella. Our findings enable forecasting of seasonal P. gossypiella population providing additional information for the development of an integrated pest management program for this pest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone traps caught approximately two to three times more pink bollworm adults than light traps.

Treatment
sex-pheromone trapse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
adultse0
Direction
moree0
Value
2-3 timese0
Comparator
light trapse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sex-pheromone traps captured approximately 2-3 times more adults than light traps in all locations during 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) using light and sex-pheromone traps in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature was negatively related to pheromone trap catches.

Treatment
sex-pheromone trapse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
trap catchese0
Direction
negativee0
Value
R2 = 0.63-0.80e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For sex-pheromone traps, temperature showed negative and strong relation (R2 = 0.63-0.80) with trap catches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) using light and sex-pheromone traps in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone trap plots had 7.0-9.0% infested bolls versus 32-37% in checks.

Treatment
sex-pheromone trapse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
bollse0
Direction
Fewere0
Value
7.0-9.0%e0
Qualifier
32-37%e0
Comparator
check plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fewer bolls (7.0-9.0%) were infested in plots where sex-pheromone traps were installed compared to check plots (32-37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) using light and sex-pheromone traps in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered pheromone trapping effective for monitoring and management.

Interactor
P. gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
monitoring and management of P. gossypiellae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pheromone trapping proved an effective and eco-friendly tool for the monitoring and management of P. gossypiella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.