Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Selection of Tomato and Cucumber Accessions for Waterlogging Sensitivity through Morpho-Physiological Assessment at an Early Vegetative Stage

Anna Kołton; Kinga Kęska; Małgorzata Czernicka

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Waterlogging anomalies have recently increased, causing a reduction in yield and the loss of billions of dollars. Plant selection for increased tolerance to stress factors requires parameters with high sensitivity, as well as fast and inexpensive measurements. The aim of this study was to select tomato and cucumber accessions that reveal sensitivity and tolerance to waterlogging stress at an early vegetative stage. The selection of effective criteria for assessing plants was also an important issue. A total of 19 cucumber (including four highly homozygous) and 16 tomato accessions were evaluated, and plants with three true leaves were examined. The root zone of stressed plants was waterlogged for 7 days in a deep container. Morphological and physiological characteristics were obtained after 7 days of treatment and used for cluster analysis for discrimination of tolerant and sensitive accessions. Significant decreases in Fv/F0, Fv/Fm, Area, PI ABS, ET0/ABS, and ET0/TR0 parameters, as well as increases in DI0/RC, were observed in sensitive accessions, with no changes in tolerant plants. The OJIP test parameters (Fv/F0, PI ABS, DI0/RC, and Area) were more sensitive in selecting for waterlogging stress than Fv/Fm. The present research can be used in breeding programs. Selected accessions will support a detailed explanation of the physiological differences in response to waterlogging stress in tomato and cucumber plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitive accessions showed significant decreases in Fv/F0, Fv/Fm and Area under waterlogging, while tolerant plants showed no changes.

Material
sensitive accessionse1
Treatment
waterlogging stresse0
Outcome
Fv/F0, Fv/Fm, Areae1
Direction
decreasese1
Comparator
tolerant plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aim of this study was to select tomato and cucumber accessions that reveal sensitivity and tolerance to waterlogging stress at an early vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–417 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant decreases in Fv/F0, Fv/Fm, Area, PI ABS, ET0/ABS, and ET0/TR0 parameters, as well as increases in DI0/RC, were observed in sensitive accessions, with no changes in tolerant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitive accessions showed significant decreases in PI ABS, ET0/ABS and ET0/TR0 under waterlogging, while tolerant plants showed no changes.

Material
sensitive accessionse1
Treatment
waterlogging stresse0
Outcome
PI ABS, ET0/ABS, and ET0/TR0e1
Direction
decreasese1
Comparator
tolerant plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aim of this study was to select tomato and cucumber accessions that reveal sensitivity and tolerance to waterlogging stress at an early vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–417 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant decreases in Fv/F0, Fv/Fm, Area, PI ABS, ET0/ABS, and ET0/TR0 parameters, as well as increases in DI0/RC, were observed in sensitive accessions, with no changes in tolerant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitive accessions showed a significant increase in DI0/RC under waterlogging, while tolerant plants showed no changes.

Material
sensitive accessionse1
Treatment
waterlogging stresse0
Outcome
DI0/RCe1
Direction
increasese1
Comparator
tolerant plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aim of this study was to select tomato and cucumber accessions that reveal sensitivity and tolerance to waterlogging stress at an early vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–417 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant decreases in Fv/F0, Fv/Fm, Area, PI ABS, ET0/ABS, and ET0/TR0 parameters, as well as increases in DI0/RC, were observed in sensitive accessions, with no changes in tolerant plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1100 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The OJIP test parameters were more sensitive than Fv/Fm in selecting for waterlogging stress.

Outcome
selecting for waterlogging stresse2
Direction
more sensitivee2
Comparator
Fv/Fme2

Verbatim

e2

“The OJIP test parameters (Fv/F0, PI ABS, DI0/RC, and Area) were more sensitive in selecting for waterlogging stress than Fv/Fm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1228 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.