Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of spacing and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of rabi fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)

RR Palanjiya; RM Solanki; Arpita Meena; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during rabi season of 2017-18 at the Instructional Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh. The experiment was laid out in a Split Plot Design with four replication. The results revealed that sowing of the fodder sorghum crop at 40 cm wider row spacing recorded significantly higher values of almost all the growth characters viz., Plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of internodes plant-1, stem thickness and drymatter accumulation while, plant population at initial and final, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield of fodder sorghum were significantly higher under closer row spacing of 20 cm. The parameters such as length of internodes, leaf: stem ratio, days to 50% flowering, remained unaffected due to different spacings. The growth characters, yield attributes, quality parameters, green and dry fodder yields were found significantly higher when crop was fertilized with 120 kg N ha-1 followed by 100 kg N ha-1, except plant population at initial and final; which was not significantly affected by the different nitrogen levels. Available nitrogen in soil after harvest of crop was significantly higher under wider row spacing of 40 cm. Higher gross and net realization of 40,556 and 21,785 ha-1, respectively with B: C ratio of 2.16 was obtained when fodder sorghum crop sown at 20 cm row spacing. Maximum gross (41,544 ha-1) and net realization ( 22,912 ha-1) along with higher B: C ratio of 2.23 were observed under nitrogen level 120 kg N ha-1 followed by nitrogen level 100 kg N ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 40 cm spacing significantly increased height, leaves, internodes, stem thickness and dry matter.

Taxon
fodder sorghumt0
Treatment
40 cm wider row spacinge0
Outcome
Plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of internodes plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
stem thickness and drymatter accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“40 cm wider row spacing recorded significantly higher values of almost all the growth characters viz., Plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of internodes plant-1, stem thickness and drymatter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 20 cm spacing significantly increased plant population and green and dry fodder yield.

Taxon
fodder sorghumt0
Treatment
closer row spacing of 20 cme0
Outcome
green fodder yield and dry fodder yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
plant population at initial and finale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant population at initial and final, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield of fodder sorghum were significantly higher under closer row spacing of 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing did not affect internode length, leaf:stem ratio or days to 50% flowering.

Taxon
fodder sorghumt0
Treatment
different spacingse0
Outcome
length of internodes, leaf: stem ratio, days to 50% floweringe0
Direction
remained unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“length of internodes, leaf: stem ratio, days to 50% flowering, remained unaffected due to different spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization at 120 kg N ha-1 gave significantly higher growth, yield, and quality than 100 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
fodder sorghumt0
Treatment
120 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
green and dry fodder yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
100 kg N ha-1e0

Verbatim

t0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“growth characters, yield attributes, quality parameters, green and dry fodder yields were found significantly higher when crop was fertilized with 120 kg N ha-1 followed by 100 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level did not significantly affect initial or final plant population.

Taxon
fodder sorghumt0
Treatment
different nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
plant population at initial and finale0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant population at initial and final; which was not significantly affected by the different nitrogen levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available nitrogen after harvest was significantly higher at 40 cm spacing.

Taxon
fodder sorghumt0
Treatment
wider row spacing of 40 cme0
Outcome
Available nitrogen in soil after harvest of crope0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Available nitrogen in soil after harvest of crop was significantly higher under wider row spacing of 40 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1249 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 cm spacing gross realization was 40,556 ha-1.

Taxon
fodder sorghumt0
Treatment
20 cm row spacinge0
Outcome
gross and net realizatione0
Direction
Highere0
Value
40,556e0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

t0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher gross and net realization of 40,556 and 21,785 ha-1, respectively with B: C ratio of 2.16 was obtained when fodder sorghum crop sown at 20 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1411 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 cm spacing net realization was 21,785 ha-1 and benefit cost ratio was 2.16.

Taxon
fodder sorghumt0
Treatment
20 cm row spacinge0
Outcome
net realizatione0
Value
21,785 ha-1e0

Verbatim

t0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“gross and net realization of 40,556 and 21,785 ha-1, respectively with B: C ratio of 2.16 was obtained when fodder sorghum crop sown at 20 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1411 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg N ha-1 gross realization reached 41,544 ha-1.

Taxon
fodder sorghumt0
Treatment
120 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
grosse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
41,544 ha-1e0

Verbatim

t0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum gross (41,544 ha-1) and net realization ( 22,912 ha-1) along with higher B: C ratio of 2.23 were observed under nitrogen level 120 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1561 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg N ha-1 net realization was 22,912 ha-1 and benefit cost ratio was 2.23.

Taxon
fodder sorghumt0
Treatment
120 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
net realizatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
22,912 ha-1e0

Verbatim

t0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“net realization ( 22,912 ha-1) along with higher B: C ratio of 2.23 were observed under nitrogen level 120 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1561 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · pest · SorghumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

density · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

34 papers: 22 positive, 12 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

density · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

98 papers: 83 positive, 15 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

290 papers: 264 positive, 26 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

286 papers more in this group

See all 290 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.