Paper · 2020 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Bio-efficacy of different insecticides against whitefly (Bemisia Tabaci) on Tomato, (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)

VG Sharma; Sushil Kumar

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted in 2015-17 to study the bio-efficacy of different insecticides against whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). It was observed that thiamethoxam 25 WG 0.008 percent was the most effective treatment in reducing the whitefly population followed by spiromesifen 22.9 SC 0.028 percent. Dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 percent was ranked third behind thiamethoxam and spiromesifen and was significantly superior over the rest of the treatments. On the other hand, quinalphos 25 EC 0.05 percent was not found effective against the pest and was the least effective treatment at all the intervals after spraying to control the whitefly population.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam at 0.008 percent was most effective at reducing whitefly population.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 25 WG 0.008 percente0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whitefly populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam 25 WG 0.008 percent was the most effective treatment in reducing the whitefly population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
t1

“whitefly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spiromesifen at 0.028 percent ranked second for whitefly reduction.

Treatment
spiromesifen 22.9 SC 0.028 percente0
Interactor
whiteflyt1pest
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by spiromesifen 22.9 SC 0.028 percent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
t1

“whitefly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethoate at 0.03 percent ranked third and significantly above the remaining treatments.

Treatment
Dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 percente0
Interactor
whiteflyt1pest
Outcome
ranked thirde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
the rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dimethoate 30 EC 0.03 percent was ranked third behind thiamethoxam and spiromesifen and was significantly superior over the rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
t1

“whitefly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quinalphos at 0.05 percent was least effective against whitefly at all post spray intervals.

Treatment
quinalphos 25 EC 0.05 percente0
Interactor
whiteflyt1pest
Outcome
whitefly populatione0
Direction
least effectivee0
Qualifier
all the intervals after sprayinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quinalphos 25 EC 0.05 percent was not found effective against the pest and was the least effective treatment at all the intervals after spraying to control the whitefly population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
t1

“whitefly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.