Abstract
The field experiment was conducted during 2016-17 and 2017-18 to assess the crop loss due to infestation of major insect pests on field pea. Gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera has been assumed the status of major pest on pea which attacks at reproductive stage of the crop. Among the sucking pests pulse aphid, Aphis craccivora is the major ones and it was observed in the field from vegetative stage. Highest pod yield, avoidable crop loss and increase in yield over control was recorded from the fully protected plot (T3), which was treated with Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.2 g/ l of water and Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/ l of water during vegetative stage and reproductive stage of the crop, respectively. The next most effective treatment was treatment (T2) with Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/ l of water at reproductive stage of the crop however, application of Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.2 g/ l of water at vegetative stage gave the good results against sucking pest. The results revealed that T3 gave maximum net profit of Rs. 13397.00/ ha and Rs. 14755.00/ ha during 2016-17 and 2017-18, respectively and it was followed by T2. Per cent pod damage was highest in untreated control (T4). Though the yield was more in T3, the incremental cost benefit ratio was highest in T1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Helicoverpa armigera is a major pea pest attacking at the reproductive stage.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigerae0pest - Outcome
- attacks at reproductive stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera has been assumed the status of major pest on pea which attacks at reproductive stage of the crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Aphis craccivora is a major sucking pest observed from the vegetative stage.
- Taxon
- field peat0
- Interactor
- Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivorae0pest - Outcome
- observed in the field from vegetative stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“pulse aphid, Aphis craccivora is the major ones and it was observed in the field from vegetative stage”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The fully protected T3 plot had the highest pod yield.
Verbatim
e0“Highest pod yield, avoidable crop loss and increase in yield over control was recorded from the fully protected plot (T3), which was treated with Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.2 g/ l of water and Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/ l of water”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The fully protected T3 plot had the highest avoidable crop loss.
Verbatim
e0“Highest pod yield, avoidable crop loss and increase in yield over control was recorded from the fully protected plot (T3), which was treated with Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.2 g/ l of water and Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/ l of water”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The fully protected T3 plot had the greatest yield increase over control.
Verbatim
e0“Highest pod yield, avoidable crop loss and increase in yield over control was recorded from the fully protected plot (T3), which was treated with Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.2 g/ l of water and Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/ l of water”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb treatment T2 was the next most effective.
Verbatim
e0“The next most effective treatment was treatment (T2) with Indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/ l of water at reproductive stage of the crop”
e1“untreated control (T4)”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam at the vegetative stage gave good results against sucking pests.
Verbatim
e0“application of Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.2 g/ l of water at vegetative stage gave the good results against sucking pest”
e1“untreated control (T4)”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced maximum net profit of Rs. 13397.00/ ha in 2016-17.
Verbatim
e0“T3 gave maximum net profit of Rs. 13397.00/ ha and Rs. 14755.00/ ha during 2016-17 and 2017-18, respectively”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced maximum net profit of Rs. 14755.00/ ha in 2017-18.
Verbatim
e0“T3 gave maximum net profit of Rs. 13397.00/ ha and Rs. 14755.00/ ha during 2016-17 and 2017-18, respectively”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated T4 had the highest pod damage percentage.
Verbatim
e0“Per cent pod damage was highest in untreated control (T4).”
t0“field pea”
Claim · model-written summary
T1 had the highest incremental cost benefit ratio.
Verbatim
e0“the incremental cost benefit ratio was highest in T1”
t0“field pea”
The same questions in other papers
thiamethoxam · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
indoxacarb · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.