Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of drip fertigation on endotoxin expression in intra hirsutum Bt Cotton

M. K. Shruti; Y. R. Aladakatti; H. M. Vamadevaiah

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Endotoxin expression in leaf of cotton genotype First Class BG-II was studied, sown under different irrigation and fertigation levels in medium deep black soil at Agricultural Research Station Dharwad, Karnataka during kharif season of 2015-16. Results revealed that expression of Cry 1Ac and Cry 2Ab protein content in leaf was non-significant at 60, 90, 120 and 150 DAS (Cry 1Ac 2.70, 1.77, 1.29 and 0.83µg g-1fresh weight and Cry 2Ab 47.66, 30.66, 25.14 and 15.14 µg g-1fresh weight, respectively) in different irrigation levels, expect at 45 DAS. Fertigation with 100 per cent recommended (RD) N & K in six equal splits recorded significantly higher protein content in leaves at 45, 60, 90 and 120 DAS (Cry 1Ac 3.33, 2.84, 2.21 and 1.33µg g-1fresh weight and Cry 2Ab 62.22, 49.32, 32.32 and 27.32) and was non-significant at 150 DAS. Cry 1Ac and Cry 2Ab protein content (3.24 and 59.33µg g-1fresh weight) were significantly higher at 45 DAS in C1 (Drip irrigation at 1.0 Etc + 100% RD N & K in 4 splits through soil (25% each as basal and at 30, 60 & 90 DAS) and no significant difference was observed for Cry 1Ac and Cry 2Ab protein content in C2 (Furrow Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio +100% RD N & K in 4 splits through soil (25% each as basal and at 30, 60 & 90 DAS).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation levels did not significantly differ in leaf Cry 1Ac content at 60, 90, 120 and 150 DAS.

Treatment
different irrigation levelse0
Gene
Cry 1Ace0
Outcome
Cry 1Ace0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression of Cry 1Ac and Cry 2Ab protein content in leaf was non-significant at 60, 90, 120 and 150 DAS (Cry 1Ac 2.70, 1.77, 1.29 and 0.83µg g-1fresh weight and Cry 2Ab 47.66, 30.66, 25.14 and 15.14 µg g-1fresh weight, respectively) in different irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation levels did not significantly differ in leaf Cry 2Ab content at 60, 90, 120 and 150 DAS.

Treatment
different irrigation levelse0
Gene
Cry 2Abe0
Outcome
Cry 2Ab protein content in leafe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression of Cry 1Ac and Cry 2Ab protein content in leaf was non-significant at 60, 90, 120 and 150 DAS (Cry 1Ac 2.70, 1.77, 1.29 and 0.83µg g-1fresh weight and Cry 2Ab 47.66, 30.66, 25.14 and 15.14 µg g-1fresh weight, respectively) in different irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended N and K fertigation in six splits raised Cry 1Ac leaf protein at 45 to 120 DAS.

Treatment
Fertigation with 100 per cent recommended (RD) N & K in six equal splitse0
Gene
Cry 1Ace0
Outcome
Cry 1Ace0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertigation with 100 per cent recommended (RD) N & K in six equal splits recorded significantly higher protein content in leaves at 45, 60, 90 and 120 DAS (Cry 1Ac 3.33, 2.84, 2.21 and 1.33µg g-1fresh weight and Cry 2Ab 62.22, 49.32, 32.32 and 27.32)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended N and K fertigation in six splits raised Cry 2Ab leaf protein at 45 to 120 DAS.

Treatment
Fertigation with 100 per cent recommended (RD) N & K in six equal splitse0
Gene
Cry 2Abe0
Outcome
Cry 2Abe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertigation with 100 per cent recommended (RD) N & K in six equal splits recorded significantly higher protein content in leaves at 45, 60, 90 and 120 DAS (Cry 1Ac 3.33, 2.84, 2.21 and 1.33µg g-1fresh weight and Cry 2Ab 62.22, 49.32, 32.32 and 27.32)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The C1 regime had significantly higher Cry 1Ac content at 45 DAS.

Treatment
C1e0
Gene
Cry 1Ace0
Outcome
Cry 1Ace0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cry 1Ac and Cry 2Ab protein content (3.24 and 59.33µg g-1fresh weight) were significantly higher at 45 DAS in C1 (Drip irrigation at 1.0 Etc + 100% RD N & K in 4 splits through soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The C1 regime had significantly higher Cry 2Ab content at 45 DAS.

Treatment
C1e0
Gene
Cry 2Abe0
Outcome
Cry 2Abe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cry 1Ac and Cry 2Ab protein content (3.24 and 59.33µg g-1fresh weight) were significantly higher at 45 DAS in C1 (Drip irrigation at 1.0 Etc + 100% RD N & K in 4 splits through soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The C2 regime showed no significant Cry 1Ac difference.

Treatment
C2e0
Gene
Cry 1Ace0
Outcome
Cry 1Ace0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference was observed for Cry 1Ac and Cry 2Ab protein content in C2 (Furrow Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio +100% RD N & K in 4 splits through soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The C2 regime showed no significant Cry 2Ab difference.

Treatment
C2e0
Gene
Cry 2Abe0
Outcome
Cry 2Abe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference was observed for Cry 1Ac and Cry 2Ab protein content in C2 (Furrow Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE ratio +100% RD N & K in 4 splits through soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 72–78 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: protein · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.