Paper · 2020 · Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports

Chlorophyll a fluorescence kinetics of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) grown under artificial continuous light

Deepak Kumar; Hanwant Singh; Shani Raj; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
110
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Continuous light can be used as a tool to understand the diurnal rhythm of plants and it can also be used to increase the plant production. In the present research, we aimed to investigate the photosynthetic performance of V. radiata under continuous light as compared with the plants grown under normal light duration. Chlorophyll a fluorescence transient (OJIP test) technique was used to understand the effect on various stages of photosynthesis and their consequences under continuous light condition. Various Chl a Fluorescence kinetic parameters such as Specific energy fluxes (per QA-reducing PSII reaction center (RC)) (ABS /RC; TR0/RC; ET0/RC; DI0/RC), phenomenological fluxes, leaf model, (ABS/CSm; TR/CSm; ETo/CSm), Quantum yields and efficiencies (φPo; φEo; Ψo) and Performance index (PIabs) was extracted and analysed in our investigation. Conclusively, our study has revealed that continuous light alters the photosynthetic performance of V. radiata at a different point but also improve plant productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light altered the photosynthetic performance of V. radiata compared with normal light duration.

Taxon
V. radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
continuous lighte0
Outcome
photosynthetic performancee1
Comparator
normal light duratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the photosynthetic performance of V. radiata under continuous light as compared with the plants grown under normal light duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–318 · show in text ↑
e1

“continuous light alters the photosynthetic performance of V. radiata at a different point but also improve plant productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous light improved the productivity of V. radiata compared with normal light duration.

Taxon
V. radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
continuous lighte1
Outcome
plant productivitye1
Direction
improvee1
Comparator
normal light duratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the photosynthetic performance of V. radiata under continuous light as compared with the plants grown under normal light duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–318 · show in text ↑
e1

“continuous light alters the photosynthetic performance of V. radiata at a different point but also improve plant productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1020 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.