Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif season of the year 2017-2018 and 2018- 2019 at College Farm, College of Agriculture, Navsari Agriculture University, Bharuch, Gujarat, to study the production potential of rainfed sorghum as influenced by in situ soil moisture conservation practices and FYM. Two levels of tillage (Deep tillage with mould board plough and planking with cultivator and shallow tillage with cultivator), three levels of seed bed preparation (raised bed with three rows, raised bed with six rows and flat bed sowing) and two levels of FYM (No FYM, FYM 10 t/ha) were evaluated in split plot design and replicated four times. Deep tillage with mould board plough and planking with cultivator recorded significantly the highest plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of internodes/plant, length of ear head, grain yield, straw yield, net return and BCR. Raised bed with three rows were recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes and yield but remained at par with raised bed with six rows. Application of FYM 10 t/ha recorded significantly higher plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of internodes/plant, length of ear head, grain yield, straw yield and net return and BCR.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum had significantly higher plant height, leaf number and internode number with deep tillage with mould board plough and planking.
- Treatment
- Deep tillage with mould board plough and planking with cultivatore1
- Outcome
- plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of internodes/plante1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- shallow tillage with cultivatore2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“production potential of rainfed sorghum”
e1“Deep tillage with mould board plough and planking with cultivator recorded significantly the highest plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of internodes/plant, length of ear head, grain yield, straw yield, net return and BCR”
e2“shallow tillage with cultivator”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum had significantly higher ear head length, grain yield and straw yield with deep tillage with mould board plough and planking.
- Treatment
- Deep tillage with mould board plough and planking with cultivatore1
- Outcome
- length of ear head, grain yield, straw yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- shallow tillage with cultivatore2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“production potential of rainfed sorghum”
e1“Deep tillage with mould board plough and planking with cultivator recorded significantly the highest plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of internodes/plant, length of ear head, grain yield, straw yield, net return and BCR”
e2“shallow tillage with cultivator”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum had significantly higher net return and BCR with deep tillage with mould board plough and planking.
- Treatment
- Deep tillage with mould board plough and planking with cultivatore1
- Outcome
- net return and BCRe1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- shallow tillage with cultivatore2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“production potential of rainfed sorghum”
e1“Deep tillage with mould board plough and planking with cultivator recorded significantly the highest plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of internodes/plant, length of ear head, grain yield, straw yield, net return and BCR”
e2“shallow tillage with cultivator”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds with three rows gave significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes and yield of sorghum than the other seed bed types.
- Treatment
- Raised bed with three rowse1
- Outcome
- growth attributes, yield attributes and yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“production potential of rainfed sorghum”
e1“Raised bed with three rows were recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds with three rows remained at par with raised beds with six rows for growth, yield attributes and yield of sorghum.
- Treatment
- Raised bed with three rowse1
- Outcome
- growth attributes, yield attributes and yielde1
- Direction
- at pare1
- Comparator
- raised bed with six rowse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“production potential of rainfed sorghum”
e1“Raised bed with three rows were recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield attributes and yield but remained at par with raised bed with six rows”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum had significantly higher plant height, leaf number and internode number with FYM at 10 t/ha.
- Treatment
- Application of FYM 10 t/hae1
- Outcome
- plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of internodes/plante1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- No FYMe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“production potential of rainfed sorghum”
e1“Application of FYM 10 t/ha recorded significantly higher plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of internodes/plant, length of ear head, grain yield, straw yield and net return and BCR”
e2“No FYM”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum had significantly higher ear head length, grain yield and straw yield with FYM at 10 t/ha.
- Treatment
- Application of FYM 10 t/hae1
- Outcome
- length of ear head, grain yield, straw yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- No FYMe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“production potential of rainfed sorghum”
e1“Application of FYM 10 t/ha recorded significantly higher plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of internodes/plant, length of ear head, grain yield, straw yield and net return and BCR”
e2“No FYM”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum had significantly higher net return and BCR with FYM at 10 t/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“production potential of rainfed sorghum”
e1“Application of FYM 10 t/ha recorded significantly higher plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of internodes/plant, length of ear head, grain yield, straw yield and net return and BCR”
e2“No FYM”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · SorghumResults differ
103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ
101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
119 papers more in this group
See all 123 papers →tillage · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
442 papers more in this group
See all 446 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.