Paper · 2020 · Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center

Chitosan-based foliar application modulated the yield and biochemical attributes of peach (Prunus persica L.) cv. Early Grand

Muhammad Sajid; Abdul Basit; Zafar Ullah; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
33
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Peach fruits are highly perishable leading to many pre- and post-harvest problems, which adds to the reduction in the potential yield and productivity. Chitosan is a natural polysaccharide, produced after alkaline chitin deacetylation. It is one of the most preferred biopolymers due to its biocompatibility, antioxidant, anticancer, biodegradability, antimicrobial, and non-toxic properties as well as being an economical material. A pre-harvesting experiment was carried out based on the problems of peach and the importance of chitosan. Results Peach trees were foliar sprayed with different concentrations of chitosan (0, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0%) at different times (30, 50, and 70 days after full bloom) to elucidate the effect of chitosan to peach yield and fruit quality. The results showed that foliar application of chitosan (1%) caused significant increases in fruit weight, volume, tree yield −1 , fruit firmness, titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid content but caused significant decreases in total soluble solid fruit juice pH and disease incidence of peach fruit. Similarly, foliar application of chitosan after 50 days of full bloom increased fruit weight, volume, yield tree −1 , firmness, titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid content with the number of fruit kg −1 , total soluble solids, juice pH, and disease incidence as compared to other application times. Conclusions It is concluded that chitosan at 1% applied after 50 days of full bloom improved most of the peach attributes studied compared to the other concentrations of chitosan at 0.50 and 0.75, and control for the production of quality peach fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent chitosan increased peach fruit weight, volume and tree yield.

Treatment
chitosan (1%)e0
Outcome
fruit weight, volume, tree yield −1e0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of chitosan (1%) caused significant increases in fruit weight, volume, tree yield −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent chitosan increased peach firmness, titratable acidity and ascorbic acid content.

Treatment
chitosan (1%)e0
Outcome
fruit firmness, titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of chitosan (1%) caused significant increases in fruit weight, volume, tree yield −1 , fruit firmness, titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent chitosan reduced total soluble solids and fruit juice pH.

Treatment
chitosan (1%)e0
Outcome
total soluble solid fruit juice pHe0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of chitosan (1%) caused significant increases in fruit weight, volume, tree yield −1 , fruit firmness, titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid content but caused significant decreases in total soluble solid fruit juice pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent chitosan reduced peach fruit disease incidence.

Outcome
disease incidence of peach fruite0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“caused significant decreases in total soluble solid fruit juice pH and disease incidence of peach fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application 50 days after bloom increased fruit weight, volume and tree yield against other times.

Treatment
foliar application of chitosan after 50 days of full bloome0
Outcome
fruit weight, volume, yield tree −1e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of chitosan after 50 days of full bloom increased fruit weight, volume, yield tree −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application 50 days after bloom increased firmness, acidity and ascorbic acid content.

Treatment
foliar application of chitosan after 50 days of full bloome0
Outcome
firmness, titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of chitosan after 50 days of full bloom increased fruit weight, volume, yield tree −1 , firmness, titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The abstract lists fruit number per kilogram, solids, pH and disease incidence alongside the 50 day effect, without a clear direction.

Outcome
number of fruit kg −1 , total soluble solids, juice pH, and disease incidencee0
Comparator
other application timese0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentDirection

Verbatim

e0

“with the number of fruit kg −1 , total soluble solids, juice pH, and disease incidence as compared to other application times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1396 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 1% chitosan at 50 days after bloom improved most peach attributes.

Outcome
chitosan at 1% applied after 50 days of full bloome0
Comparator
other concentrations of chitosan at 0.50 and 0.75, and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan at 1% applied after 50 days of full bloom improved most of the peach attributes studied compared to the other concentrations of chitosan at 0.50 and 0.75, and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1606 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chitosan · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.