Paper · 2020 · Arquivos do Instituto Biológico

Pollination service of Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees in strawberry

Giuliana Ribeiro da Silva; Raquel Pérez-Maluf; Generosa Sousa Ribeiro; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Strawberry presents moderate dependence on bee pollination service, and pollination is related to the production and quality of fruits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pollination service provided by Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees in strawberry. Primary flowers of cultivar San Andreas were used in a completely randomized experimental design, with twelve replicates and five types of pollination: one N. testaceicornis visit (1V); two N. testaceicornis visits (2V); three N. testaceicornis visits (3V); natural pollination (NP); self-pollination (SP). In flowers visited by N. testaceicornis, movements and visit time were observed. The following fruit characteristics were evaluated: fruit biometry, fecundation rate of achenes, postharvest fruit quality, contribution of pollination agents and mechanisms on average fruit weight. In fruit biometry, pollination service contributed only in longitudinal length, which was higher in NP and 3V, compared to SP. In the different types of pollination, the fertilization rate of achenes did not differ and showed no effect on fresh fruit weight. In post-harvest fruit quality, 1V, 3V and NP showed better results regarding degree of deformation and marketability. Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees and natural pollination contributed to the average fresh weight of strawberry fruits. Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees and natural pollination provided improvement in quality and added value of fruits. Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees were effective strawberry pollinators.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural pollination and three bee visits produced longer fruits than self-pollination.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
NP and 3Ve0
Interactor
Nannotrigona testaceicornisNannotrigona testaceicornise1pollinator
Outcome
longitudinal lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nannotrigona testaceicornis
Nannotrigona testaceicornis · InteractorCarlos Alexandre Mattos Raposo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longitudinal length, which was higher in NP and 3V, compared to SP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees in strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Achene fertilization rate did not differ among pollination types.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
different types of pollinatione0
Interactor
Nannotrigona testaceicornisNannotrigona testaceicornise1pollinator
Outcome
fertilization rate of achenese0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nannotrigona testaceicornis
Nannotrigona testaceicornis · InteractorCarlos Alexandre Mattos Raposo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the different types of pollination, the fertilization rate of achenes did not differ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees in strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–275 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Achene fertilization rate showed no effect on fresh fruit weight.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Organ / stage
achenese0
Outcome
fresh fruit weighte0
Direction
no effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization rate of achenes did not differ and showed no effect on fresh fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees in strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One bee visit, three visits and natural pollination gave better deformation and marketability results.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
1V, 3V and NPe0
Interactor
Nannotrigona testaceicornisNannotrigona testaceicornise1pollinator
Outcome
degree of deformation and marketabilitye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nannotrigona testaceicornis
Nannotrigona testaceicornis · InteractorCarlos Alexandre Mattos Raposo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1V, 3V and NP showed better results regarding degree of deformation and marketability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees in strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bee visits and natural pollination contributed to mean fresh fruit weight.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees and natural pollinatione0
Interactor
Nannotrigona testaceicornisNannotrigona testaceicornise0pollinator
Outcome
average fresh weight of strawberry fruitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nannotrigona testaceicornis
Nannotrigona testaceicornis · InteractorCarlos Alexandre Mattos Raposo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees and natural pollination contributed to the average fresh weight of strawberry fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bee visits and natural pollination improved fruit quality and added value.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees and natural pollinatione0
Interactor
Nannotrigona testaceicornisNannotrigona testaceicornise0pollinator
Outcome
quality and added value of fruitse0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nannotrigona testaceicornis
Nannotrigona testaceicornis · InteractorCarlos Alexandre Mattos Raposo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees and natural pollination provided improvement in quality and added value of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nannotrigona testaceicornis bees were effective strawberry pollinators.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Interactor
Nannotrigona testaceicornisNannotrigona testaceicornise0pollinator
Outcome
effective strawberry pollinatorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nannotrigona testaceicornis
Nannotrigona testaceicornis · InteractorCarlos Alexandre Mattos Raposo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nannotrigona testaceicornis stingless bees were effective strawberry pollinators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1576 · show in text ↑

pollination · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

pollination · quality: general · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.