Paper · 2020 · Antioxidants

Preharvest Salicylate Treatments Enhance Antioxidant Compounds, Color and Crop Yield in Low Pigmented-Table Grape Cultivars and Preserve Quality Traits during Storage

María E. García-Pastor; Pedro J. Zapata; Salvador Castillo; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Previous reports reported on the effectiveness of preharvest salicylic acid (SA) treatment on increasing fruit quality properties although no information is available about acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) and methyl salicylate (MeSa) treatments. Thus, SA, ASA and MeSa were applied at 1, 5, and 10 mM in 2016 and at 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mM in 2017 to vines of 'Magenta' and 'Crimson' table grapes. Preharvest salicylate treatments at high concentration, 5 and 10 mM, delayed berry ripening and reduced crop yield, while ripening was accelerated and yield increased at lower concentrations. In addition, SA, ASA, and MeSa treatments, at 1, 0.1, and 0.01 mM, improved berry color due to increased concentration of total and individual anthocyanins, for both cultivars. Quality parameters, and especially, antioxidant bioactive compounds, such as total phenolics and total and individual anthocyanins, were found at higher levels in treated berries at harvest and during prolonged cold storage, the highest effects being found in 0.1 mM MeSa treated table grapes. Overall, it could be concluded that MeSa treatment at 0.1 mM could be the most useful tool to increase bioactive compounds with antioxidant properties in table grape and in turn, their health beneficial properties, with additional effects on increasing crop yield, accelerating on-vine ripening process and maintaining quality traits during prolonged storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High concentration salicylates delayed berry ripening.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
salicylate treatments at high concentration, 5 and 10 mMe0
Outcome
berry ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Preharvest salicylate treatments at high concentration, 5 and 10 mM, delayed berry ripening and reduced crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High concentration salicylates reduced crop yield.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
salicylate treatments at high concentration, 5 and 10 mMe0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Preharvest salicylate treatments at high concentration, 5 and 10 mM, delayed berry ripening and reduced crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower concentrations accelerated ripening.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
lower concentrationse0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ripening was accelerated and yield increased at lower concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower concentrations increased yield.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
lower concentrationse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ripening was accelerated and yield increased at lower concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mM improved berry color through anthocyanins.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
berry colore0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“SA, ASA, and MeSa treatments, at 1, 0.1, and 0.01 mM, improved berry color due to increased concentration of total and individual anthocyanins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASA at 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mM improved berry color through anthocyanins.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
ASAe0
Outcome
berry colore0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“SA, ASA, and MeSa treatments, at 1, 0.1, and 0.01 mM, improved berry color due to increased concentration of total and individual anthocyanins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeSa at 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mM improved berry color through anthocyanins.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
MeSae0
Outcome
berry colore0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“SA, ASA, and MeSa treatments, at 1, 0.1, and 0.01 mM, improved berry color due to increased concentration of total and individual anthocyanins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated berries had higher phenolics and anthocyanins at harvest and during storage.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
treated berriese0
Outcome
total phenolics and total and individual anthocyaninse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“total phenolics and total and individual anthocyanins, were found at higher levels in treated berries at harvest and during prolonged cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strongest quality effects were observed with 0.1 mM MeSa.

Taxon
table grapese0
Treatment
0.1 mM MeSae0
Outcome
effectse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the highest effects being found in 0.1 mM MeSa treated table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–123 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favored 0.1 mM MeSa to improve antioxidants, yield, ripening and stored quality.

Taxon
table grapee0
Outcome
MeSa treatment at 0.1 mM could be the most useful toole0

Verbatim

e0

“MeSa treatment at 0.1 mM could be the most useful tool to increase bioactive compounds with antioxidant properties in table grape and in turn, their health beneficial properties, with additional effects on increasing crop yield, accelerating on-vine ripening process and maintaining quality traits during prolonged storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1410 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.