Paper · 2020 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Influence of plant growth regulators and fertigation on yield and economic feasibility of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Sinduri under high density planting system

Mahaveer Suman; MC Jain

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in the pomegranate orchard established under high density planting system, during July 2018 to December 2018 and again during July 2019 to December 2019. The experiment was laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design and experiment comprised of 27 treatment combinations consisting of plant growth regulators levels (NAA 0, 50 and 100 ppm and ethrel 0, 150 and 250 ppm) and fertigation levels (0, 75 and 100% recommended dose of fertilizers). Results revealed that maximum mean yield per plant (6.80 kg) and yield per hectare (75.52 quintal) was recorded under F2 (fertigation 100% recommended dose of fertilizers). However, interaction effect of NAA, ethrel and fertigation were found to be relatively higher to their individual effect. In interaction effect maximum mean yield per plant (8.09 kg) and yield per hectare (89.85 quintal) was recorded under N2E1F2 (100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation). In the same way, maximum gross return of Rs. 2,32,400/ha and Rs. 3,07,360/ha which was Rs. 1,06,250/ha and Rs. 1,41,740/ha excess over control during 2018 and 2019, respectively was recorded under N2E1F2 (100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation at 100% recommended dose gave the maximum mean yield per plant of pomegranate, 6.80 kg.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
fertigation 100% recommended dose of fertilizerse1
Outcome
mean yield per plante1
Direction
maximume1
Value
6.80 kge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in the pomegranate orchard established under high density planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum mean yield per plant (6.80 kg) and yield per hectare (75.52 quintal) was recorded under F2 (fertigation 100% recommended dose of fertilizers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation at 100% recommended dose gave the maximum yield per hectare of pomegranate, 75.52 quintal.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
fertigation 100% recommended dose of fertilizerse1
Outcome
yield per hectaree1
Direction
maximume1
Value
75.52 quintale1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in the pomegranate orchard established under high density planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum mean yield per plant (6.80 kg) and yield per hectare (75.52 quintal) was recorded under F2 (fertigation 100% recommended dose of fertilizers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination 100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation gave the maximum mean yield per plant, 8.09 kg.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigatione2
Outcome
mean yield per plante2
Direction
maximume2
Value
8.09 kge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in the pomegranate orchard established under high density planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“In interaction effect maximum mean yield per plant (8.09 kg) and yield per hectare (89.85 quintal) was recorded under N2E1F2 (100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination 100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation gave the maximum yield per hectare, 89.85 quintal.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigatione2
Outcome
yield per hectaree2
Direction
maximume2
Value
89.85 quintale2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in the pomegranate orchard established under high density planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“In interaction effect maximum mean yield per plant (8.09 kg) and yield per hectare (89.85 quintal) was recorded under N2E1F2 (100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interaction effect of NAA, ethrel and fertigation was relatively higher than their individual effects on pomegranate.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
NAA, ethrel and fertigatione3
Outcome
interaction effecte3
Direction
relatively highere3
Comparator
their individual effecte3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in the pomegranate orchard established under high density planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“interaction effect of NAA, ethrel and fertigation were found to be relatively higher to their individual effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum gross return of Rs. 2,32,400/ha was recorded under 100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigatione4
Outcome
gross returne4
Direction
maximume4
Value
Rs. 2,32,400/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in the pomegranate orchard established under high density planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“maximum gross return of Rs. 2,32,400/ha and Rs. 3,07,360/ha which was Rs. 1,06,250/ha and Rs. 1,41,740/ha excess over control during 2018 and 2019, respectively was recorded under N2E1F2 (100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum gross return of Rs. 3,07,360/ha was recorded under 100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigatione4
Outcome
gross returne4
Direction
maximume4
Value
Rs. 3,07,360/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in the pomegranate orchard established under high density planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“maximum gross return of Rs. 2,32,400/ha and Rs. 3,07,360/ha which was Rs. 1,06,250/ha and Rs. 1,41,740/ha excess over control during 2018 and 2019, respectively was recorded under N2E1F2 (100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross return in 2018 was Rs. 1,06,250/ha in excess over control under 100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigatione4
Outcome
gross returne4
Direction
excesse4
Value
Rs. 1,06,250/hae4
Comparator
controle4
Setting
2018e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in the pomegranate orchard established under high density planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“maximum gross return of Rs. 2,32,400/ha and Rs. 3,07,360/ha which was Rs. 1,06,250/ha and Rs. 1,41,740/ha excess over control during 2018 and 2019, respectively was recorded under N2E1F2 (100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross return in 2019 was Rs. 1,41,740/ha in excess over control under 100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigatione4
Outcome
gross returne4
Direction
excesse4
Value
Rs. 1,41,740/hae4
Comparator
controle4
Setting
2019e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was conducted in the pomegranate orchard established under high density planting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“maximum gross return of Rs. 2,32,400/ha and Rs. 3,07,360/ha which was Rs. 1,06,250/ha and Rs. 1,41,740/ha excess over control during 2018 and 2019, respectively was recorded under N2E1F2 (100 ppm NAA + 150 ppm ethrel + 100% RDF through fertigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1221 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.