Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Yield, economics and quality improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as affected by integrated nutrient management under late sown condition

Vishram Singh; Ram Pyare; Gaurav Kumar Singh

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiments were conducted during Rabi season 2013-14 and 2014-15 at Students’ Instructional Farm, C.S. Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur (UP) with a view to find out the effect of vermicompost and FYM with chemical fertilizers on production, productivity and quality improvement of late sown wheat. The soil of experimental field was sandy loam in texture having organic carbon (0.34%), available nitrogen (170 kg/ha), P2O5 (12.6 kg/ha) and K2O (155 kg/ha) with soil pH (7.7). Nine treatments were tested in Randomized Block Design with three replications. On the basis of experimental results it was found that highest grain yield (43.20 and 38.88 q/ha) was received in RDF + Vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha followed by (41.90 and 37.71q/ha) in RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha while highest net profit (Rs. 25044 and 18594/ha) and B:C ratio (1.47 and 1.33) was received in RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha in first and second year, respectively. The minimum grain yield (33.70 and 32.13 q/ha) was received in RDF 100% while minimum net profit (Rs. 14540 and 13353/ha) was recorded in RDF + FYM @ 5 t/ha during both the years, respectively. The minimum B:C ratio (1.27 and 1.19) was recorded in RDF + FYM 15 q/ha in first and second year of experimentation. Improvement the minimum protein content (10.97 and 11.03%) recorded under RDF (100%) doses treatment followed by RDF 125% (11.04 and 11.03%) were found significantly at par and maximum protein content (11.93 and 11.93%) was recorded under RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha treatment in both the years, respectively. The maximum protein yield (5.15 and 4.64 q/ha) recorded under RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha and minimum protein yield (3.70 and 3.54 q/ha) was recorded under control treatment the significant during both the year of experimentation, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + Vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha recorded highest grain yield (43.20 and 38.88 q/ha).

Treatment
RDF + Vermicompost @ 5.0 t/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
43.20 and 38.88 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the basis of experimental results it was found that highest grain yield (43.20 and 38.88 q/ha) was received in RDF + Vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha followed by (41.90 and 37.71q/ha) in RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha while highest net profit (Rs. 25044 and 18594/ha) and B:C ratio (1.47 and 1.33) was received in RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha in first and second year, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha recorded followed by grain yield (41.90 and 37.71q/ha).

Treatment
RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
41.90 and 37.71q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the basis of experimental results it was found that highest grain yield (43.20 and 38.88 q/ha) was received in RDF + Vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha followed by (41.90 and 37.71q/ha) in RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha while highest net profit (Rs. 25044 and 18594/ha) and B:C ratio (1.47 and 1.33) was received in RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha in first and second year, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha recorded highest net profit (Rs. 25044 and 18594/ha).

Treatment
RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + vermicompost @ 1.25 t/hae0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 25044 and 18594/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the basis of experimental results it was found that highest grain yield (43.20 and 38.88 q/ha) was received in RDF + Vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha followed by (41.90 and 37.71q/ha) in RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha while highest net profit (Rs. 25044 and 18594/ha) and B:C ratio (1.47 and 1.33) was received in RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha in first and second year, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha recorded highest B:C ratio (1.47 and 1.33).

Treatment
RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + vermicompost @ 1.25 t/hae0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.47 and 1.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the basis of experimental results it was found that highest grain yield (43.20 and 38.88 q/ha) was received in RDF + Vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha followed by (41.90 and 37.71q/ha) in RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + Vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha while highest net profit (Rs. 25044 and 18594/ha) and B:C ratio (1.47 and 1.33) was received in RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + vermicompost @ 1.25 t/ha in first and second year, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF 100% recorded minimum grain yield (33.70 and 32.13 q/ha).

Treatment
RDF 100%e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
33.70 and 32.13 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum grain yield (33.70 and 32.13 q/ha) was received in RDF 100% while minimum net profit (Rs. 14540 and 13353/ha) was recorded in RDF + FYM @ 5 t/ha during both the years, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM @ 5 t/ha recorded minimum net profit (Rs. 14540 and 13353/ha).

Treatment
RDF + FYM @ 5 t/hae0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
minimume0
Value
Rs. 14540 and 13353/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum grain yield (33.70 and 32.13 q/ha) was received in RDF 100% while minimum net profit (Rs. 14540 and 13353/ha) was recorded in RDF + FYM @ 5 t/ha during both the years, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM 15 q/ha recorded minimum B:C ratio (1.27 and 1.19).

Treatment
RDF + FYM 15 q/hae0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1.27 and 1.19e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum B:C ratio (1.27 and 1.19) was recorded in RDF + FYM 15 q/ha in first and second year of experimentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF (100%) recorded minimum protein content (10.97 and 11.03%).

Treatment
RDF (100%)e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
minimume0
Value
10.97 and 11.03%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improvement the minimum protein content (10.97 and 11.03%) recorded under RDF (100%) doses treatment followed by RDF 125% (11.04 and 11.03%) were found significantly at par and maximum protein content (11.93 and 11.93%) was recorded under RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha treatment in both the years, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF 125% recorded significantly at par protein content (11.04 and 11.03%).

Treatment
RDF 125%e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
significantly at pare0
Value
11.04 and 11.03%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improvement the minimum protein content (10.97 and 11.03%) recorded under RDF (100%) doses treatment followed by RDF 125% (11.04 and 11.03%) were found significantly at par and maximum protein content (11.93 and 11.93%) was recorded under RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha treatment in both the years, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha recorded maximum protein content (11.93 and 11.93%).

Treatment
RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/hae0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.93 and 11.93%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improvement the minimum protein content (10.97 and 11.03%) recorded under RDF (100%) doses treatment followed by RDF 125% (11.04 and 11.03%) were found significantly at par and maximum protein content (11.93 and 11.93%) was recorded under RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha treatment in both the years, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha recorded maximum protein yield (5.15 and 4.64 q/ha).

Treatment
RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/hae0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.15 and 4.64 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum protein yield (5.15 and 4.64 q/ha) recorded under RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha and minimum protein yield (3.70 and 3.54 q/ha) was recorded under control treatment the significant during both the year of experimentation, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1862 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

control treatment recorded minimum protein yield (3.70 and 3.54 q/ha).

Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
3.70 and 3.54 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum protein yield (5.15 and 4.64 q/ha) recorded under RDF + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha and minimum protein yield (3.70 and 3.54 q/ha) was recorded under control treatment the significant during both the year of experimentation, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1862 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.