Paper · 2009 · Misr journal of agricultural engineering

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A MECHANISM FOR GREEN ONION HANDLING

M. A. Mayhoub; E. A. El-Sahhar; A. G. El-Kabany; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to design and evaluation performance of mechanism for green onion crop handling, as well as, improving the crop quality based on the suggested handling system. However, the suggested handling system consists of feeding unit, trimming unit which based on rotary cutting mechanism, antioxidant unit and tying unit. The following technical parameters had been considered to evaluate the suggesting mechanism: feeding belt speed, feeding rate, cutting disc speed, tying position of onion bundle relative to the cutting disc, angle of cutting disc and discharge rate of ascorbic acid. However, the following technical indicators had been estimated such as machine productivity, trimming efficiency, cutting offset angle of plants, the quality of the final product and the costs of green onion produced by mechanism system. Results indicated that the machine productivity was found to be 316.2 kg/h, handling system efficiency was 75.89 %, the trimming efficiency was 89.15 %, cutting offset angle of plants was 22º, at 12.5 cm/s feeding-belt speed and when 5.6 kg/min feeding rate. With operated at 5.11 m/s cutting disc speed, the optimum tying position during trimming process is 7.5 cm, the wilting coefficient was (0.09 mm/day) at discharge rate of 5 l/h and handling machine reduced the cost of green onion trimming to 1: 2.67 as compared with manual method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The green onion handling machine had a productivity of 316.2 kg/h

Taxon
GREEN ONIONt0
Outcome
machine productivitye1
Value
316.2 kg/he1

Verbatim

t0

“PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A MECHANISM FOR GREEN ONION HANDLING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“machine productivity was found to be 316.2 kg/h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–926 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The handling system efficiency was 75.89 %

Taxon
GREEN ONIONt0
Outcome
handling system efficiencye2
Value
75.89 %e2

Verbatim

t0

“PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A MECHANISM FOR GREEN ONION HANDLING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
e2

“handling system efficiency was 75.89 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–966 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trimming efficiency was 89.15 %

Taxon
GREEN ONIONt0
Outcome
trimming efficiencye3
Value
89.15 %e3

Verbatim

t0

“PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A MECHANISM FOR GREEN ONION HANDLING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
e3

“the trimming efficiency was 89.15 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1003 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cutting offset angle of green onion plants was 22 degrees

Taxon
GREEN ONIONt0
Outcome
cutting offset angle of plantse4
Value
22ºe4

Verbatim

t0

“PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A MECHANISM FOR GREEN ONION HANDLING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
e4

“cutting offset angle of plants was 22º”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1043 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wilting coefficient was 0.09 mm/day at a discharge rate of 5 l/h

Taxon
GREEN ONIONt0
Treatment
discharge rate of 5 l/he5
Outcome
wilting coefficiente5
Value
0.09 mm/daye5

Verbatim

t0

“PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A MECHANISM FOR GREEN ONION HANDLING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
e5

“the wilting coefficient was (0.09 mm/day) at discharge rate of 5 l/h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1287 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The handling machine reduced the cost of green onion trimming to 1: 2.67 compared with the manual method

Taxon
GREEN ONIONt0
Outcome
cost of green onion trimminge6
Direction
reducede6
Value
1: 2.67e6
Comparator
manual methode6

Verbatim

t0

“PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A MECHANISM FOR GREEN ONION HANDLING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
e6

“handling machine reduced the cost of green onion trimming to 1: 2.67 as compared with manual method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1391 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum tying position during trimming is 7.5 cm from the cutting disc

Taxon
GREEN ONIONt0
Outcome
optimum tying position during trimming processe7
Value
7.5 cme7

Verbatim

t0

“PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A MECHANISM FOR GREEN ONION HANDLING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
e7

“the optimum tying position during trimming process is 7.5 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1217 · show in text ↑