Paper · 2019 · Interdepartmental Thematic Scientific Collection of Plant Protection and Quarantine

Efficiency of modern fungicides in protection of vineyards from fungal diseases

Yu. Klechkovskyi; V. Bolshakova; K. Shmatkovska

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Goal. To investigate the effectiveness of the fungicide prosper 300 CS, SK (spiroxamin 300 g/l) and the fungicide Serenade ASO SC, SC (Bacillus subtilis, strain QST 713) on the susceptibility of vine plants with oidium and Botrytis. Methods. Field, in the vineyards of the Odessa region. Soil — South cerebrospinale black earth, humus content 3.2% and soil pH 6.9—7.0. The nutrition area of the bushes 3 ќ 1.5 m, forming — Wallpaper of vysokooktanovyj twoplace horizontal cordon. Treatment of the soil at fallow without irrigation. Event for care experienced areas — spring pruning bushes, garter green shoots of chip topping green shoots, chasing, side-shoot removing. Determined the effectiveness of drugs in different doses against powdery mildew (pathogen Uncinula necator Berk.) and gray mold (causative agent Botrytis cinerea Pers.). The counts were performed according to standard techniques, using experimental methods in Phytopathology and plant protection. Results. The use of the fungicide prosper 300 CS, SK, for two-time spraying of vineyards in the consumption rate of 1.2 l/ha showed the effectiveness of grape against pathogen oidium on the leaves — 85.0%, the brushes of 84.1%. The biopesticide Serenade ASO SC, CS showed the best results against the pathogen Botrytis at a rate of 6.0 to 8.0 l/ha. Efficacy on grapes was 82.9—85%. Conclusions. The use of the fungicide prosper 300 CS, SK (1.2 l/ha) and the fungicide Serenade ASO SC, KS (6.0 to 8.0 l/ha) reduced the manifestation of diseases on grape bushes and control their further spread during the growing season. Restrictions on the development and destruction of oidium and Botrytis in the vineyards, for the use of investigational drugs, provided higher yields and quality parameters of wine.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prosper at 1.2 l/ha achieved 85.0% oidium effectiveness on grape leaves.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
fungicide prosper 300 CS, SK, for two-time spraying of vineyards in the consumption rate of 1.2 l/hae0
Interactor
oidiumOidiume0pathogen
Outcome
effectiveness of grape against pathogen oidium on the leavese0
Value
85.0%e0
Setting
Odessa regione1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oidium
Oidium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBedlan Gerhard, Dr., Institut für Pflanzenschutz, BOKU, Tulln, Österreich. · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the fungicide prosper 300 CS, SK, for two-time spraying of vineyards in the consumption rate of 1.2 l/ha showed the effectiveness of grape against pathogen oidium on the leaves — 85.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field, in the vineyards of the Odessa region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prosper at 1.2 l/ha achieved 84.1% oidium effectiveness on grape brushes.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
fungicide prosper 300 CS, SK, for two-time spraying of vineyards in the consumption rate of 1.2 l/hae0
Interactor
oidiumOidiume0pathogen
Outcome
the brushese0
Value
84.1%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oidium
Oidium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBedlan Gerhard, Dr., Institut für Pflanzenschutz, BOKU, Tulln, Österreich. · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the fungicide prosper 300 CS, SK, for two-time spraying of vineyards in the consumption rate of 1.2 l/ha showed the effectiveness of grape against pathogen oidium on the leaves — 85.0%, the brushes of 84.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serenade at 6.0 to 8.0 l/ha gave 82.9—85% efficacy against Botrytis on grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Serenade ASO SC, CSe0
Interactor
BotrytisBotrytise0pathogen
Outcome
Efficacy on grapese0
Direction
beste0
Value
82.9—85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Botrytis
Botrytis · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biopesticide Serenade ASO SC, CS showed the best results against the pathogen Botrytis at a rate of 6.0 to 8.0 l/ha. Efficacy on grapes was 82.9—85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicides reduced disease manifestation and spread on grape bushes during the growing season.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
fungicide prosper 300 CS, SK (1.2 l/ha) and the fungicide Serenade ASO SC, KS (6.0 to 8.0 l/ha)e0
Outcome
manifestation of diseases on grape bushes and control their further spreade0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the fungicide prosper 300 CS, SK (1.2 l/ha) and the fungicide Serenade ASO SC, KS (6.0 to 8.0 l/ha) reduced the manifestation of diseases on grape bushes and control their further spread during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease control with the studied drugs provided higher wine yields.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
investigational drugse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“for the use of investigational drugs, provided higher yields and quality parameters of wine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1767 · show in text ↑
e1

“oidium and Botrytis in the vineyards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1674 · show in text ↑
e2

“grape bushes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease control with the studied drugs provided higher wine quality parameters.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
investigational drugse0
Outcome
quality parameters of winee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“for the use of investigational drugs, provided higher yields and quality parameters of wine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1767 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape bushes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1526 · show in text ↑

fungicide · control · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.