Paper · 2020 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Productivity and nutritional and nutraceutical value of strawberry fruits (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) cultivated under irrigation with treated wastewaters

Lapo Renai; Francesca Tozzi; Cristina VA Scordo; et al.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Agriculture represents a productive sector typically characterized by a high water demand, whereas freshwater (FW) availability is a problem of increasing concern in the world and FW resources are becoming insufficient for sustaining agricultural irrigation. The reuse of treated wastewaters (TWWs) for crop irrigation could be an efficient tool for reducing water shortage. Hence, the present study evaluated the food quality of Fragaria x ananassa (cultivar Camarosa) fruits irrigated with four types of treated wastewaters (TWWs). Strawberries were analysed for yield, sucrose, fructose, glucose, total soluble polyphenols (TSP), total monomeric anthocyanins (TMA), and antiradical and antioxidant capacity. In addition, a targeted quantification of the most representative phenolic compounds of strawberry was performed. RESULTS: ). The reuse of TWWs reduced fruit yield (10-26%) compared to irrigation with tap water as a control. Irrigation with TWWs gave also rise to the decrease of total sugars (14-26%), TSP (2-10%) and TMA (29-49%). Individual phenolic acids, flavonols and flavanols were quite stable in response to the irrigation with TWWs, whereas anthocyanidins decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: Although TWWs negatively affected fruit quality, the nutritional and nutraceutical parameters determined in the present study were in line with data previously reported for strawberries purchased in the market or cultivated in research orchards, thus suggesting that the use of TWWs does not prevent the fruit marketability. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wastewater irrigation reduced strawberry fruit yield by 10-26% relative to tap water.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Camarosae1
Treatment
TWWse0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10-26%e0
Comparator
irrigation with tap watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reuse of TWWs reduced fruit yield (10-26%) compared to irrigation with tap water as a control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–947 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa (cultivar Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wastewater irrigation decreased strawberry total sugars by 14-26%.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Camarosae1
Treatment
TWWse0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
14-26%e0
Comparator
irrigation with tap watere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with TWWs gave also rise to the decrease of total sugars (14-26%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1024 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa (cultivar Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–481 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to irrigation with tap water as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wastewater irrigation decreased total soluble polyphenols by 2-10%.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae2
Material
Camarosae2
Treatment
TWWse3
Outcome
TSPe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
2-10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease of total sugars (14-26%), TSP (2-10%) and TMA (29-49%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“total soluble polyphenols (TSP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–643 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fragaria x ananassa (cultivar Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–481 · show in text ↑
e3

“Irrigation with TWWs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wastewater irrigation decreased total monomeric anthocyanins by 29-49%.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Camarosae1
Treatment
TWWse2
Outcome
TMAe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
29-49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease of total sugars (14-26%), TSP (2-10%) and TMA (29-49%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa (cultivar Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–481 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrigation with TWWs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual phenolic acids, flavonols and flavanols were stable under treated wastewater irrigation.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Camarosae1
Treatment
irrigation with TWWse0
Outcome
Individual phenolic acids, flavonols and flavanolse0
Direction
quite stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Individual phenolic acids, flavonols and flavanols were quite stable in response to the irrigation with TWWs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa (cultivar Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanidins decreased significantly under treated wastewater irrigation.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae2
Material
Camarosae2
Treatment
irrigation with TWWse1
Outcome
anthocyanidinse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthocyanidins decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation with TWWs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1164 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fragaria x ananassa (cultivar Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–481 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The measured strawberry nutritional and nutraceutical parameters remained in line with previously reported market or research-orchard fruit.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Material
Camarosae1
Outcome
nutritional and nutraceutical parameterse0
Comparator
strawberries purchased in the market or cultivated in research orchardse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional and nutraceutical parameters determined in the present study were in line with data previously reported for strawberries purchased in the market or cultivated in research orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1470 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa (cultivar Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–481 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that treated wastewater use does not prevent strawberry fruit marketability.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae1
Outcome
the use of TWWs does not prevent the fruit marketabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of TWWs does not prevent the fruit marketability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1549 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fragaria x ananassa (cultivar Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–481 · show in text ↑

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.