Abstract
Abstract The yield level of the spring triticale and its structure is largely determined by the timing and methods of harvesting, especially in the region where this crop was not cultivated previously. This issue is important for Amur region because it is located in the zone of risky agriculture and harvesting of spring triticale here runs in difficult conditions. The research aims to establish optimal terms and methods of harvesting, which will accelerate the introduction of this new crop in the region. In 2014-2016 field studies were conducted with methods generally accepted for grain crops. It was established that the highest grain yield at optimal terms of sowing, was obtained during harvesting on August 25th (in the phase of grain’s full ripeness). Earlier harvesting resulted in an 11-29% reduction of yield. It was especially noticeable in Carmen variety. During harvesting on August 4th, this variety’s yield decreased by 0.69 tons per hector (metric, t/ha). Similarly, with a later harvest date (September 1st), all varieties showed lower yields. This was especially evident in Ukro variety with a 17% reduction. As for harvesting on August 4th and 11th, while grain moisture exceeded 20%, a separate method of cropping turned out to give the best results. Yields in these experiments amounted to 2.31 - 2.55 t/ha (Dill variety), 2.06 - 2.17 t/ha (Yarilo variety), and 1.81 - 2.26 t/ha (Carmen variety). August 18th is optimal for the two-phase method of harvesting when crops reach the spring triticale phase - the middle of grain wax ripeness. In this case, the yield amounted to 2.33 t/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Harvesting on August 25th at full grain ripeness produced the highest yield.
- Taxon
- spring triticale
×Triticosecalet0 - Organ / stage
- grain’s full ripenesse0
- Treatment
- harvesting on August 25the0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest grain yield at optimal terms of sowing, was obtained during harvesting on August 25th (in the phase of grain’s full ripeness)”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Earlier harvesting reduced yield by 11-29%.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- Earlier harvestinge0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 11-29%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Earlier harvesting resulted in an 11-29% reduction of yield”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Carmen yield fell by 0.69 tons per hector with August 4th harvest.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Carmene0
- Treatment
- harvesting on August 4the0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 0.69 tons per hector (metric, t/ha)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Carmen variety. During harvesting on August 4th, this variety’s yield decreased by 0.69 tons per hector (metric, t/ha)”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
All varieties had lower yields with September 1st harvest.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- later harvest date (September 1st)e0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with a later harvest date (September 1st), all varieties showed lower yields”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Ukro yield decreased by 17% with the later harvest.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Ukroe0
- Treatment
- later harvest date (September 1st)e0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 17%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with a later harvest date (September 1st), all varieties showed lower yields. This was especially evident in Ukro variety with a 17% reduction”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
A separate cropping method gave the best results on August 4th and 11th when grain moisture exceeded 20%.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- a separate method of croppinge0
- Outcome
- best resultse0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- grain moisture exceeded 20%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“As for harvesting on August 4th and 11th, while grain moisture exceeded 20%, a separate method of cropping turned out to give the best results”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Dill variety yielded 2.31 - 2.55 t/ha in the early-harvest experiments.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Dill varietye0
- Outcome
- Yieldse0
- Value
- 2.31 - 2.55 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yields in these experiments amounted to 2.31 - 2.55 t/ha (Dill variety), 2.06 - 2.17 t/ha (Yarilo variety), and 1.81 - 2.26 t/ha (Carmen variety)”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Yarilo variety yielded 2.06 - 2.17 t/ha in the early-harvest experiments.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Yarilo varietye0
- Outcome
- Yieldse0
- Value
- 2.06 - 2.17 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yields in these experiments amounted to 2.31 - 2.55 t/ha (Dill variety), 2.06 - 2.17 t/ha (Yarilo variety), and 1.81 - 2.26 t/ha (Carmen variety)”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Carmen variety yielded 1.81 - 2.26 t/ha in the early-harvest experiments.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Carmen varietye0
- Outcome
- Yieldse0
- Value
- 1.81 - 2.26 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yields in these experiments amounted to 2.31 - 2.55 t/ha (Dill variety), 2.06 - 2.17 t/ha (Yarilo variety), and 1.81 - 2.26 t/ha (Carmen variety)”
t0“spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
August 18th was optimal for two-phase harvest at middle grain wax ripeness, with 2.33 t/ha yield.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Organ / stage
- middle of grain wax ripenesse0
- Treatment
- two-phase method of harvestinge0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- optimale0
- Value
- 2.33 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“August 18th is optimal for the two-phase method of harvesting when crops reach the spring triticale phase - the middle of grain wax ripeness. In this case, the yield amounted to 2.33 t/ha”
The same questions in other papers
harvest time · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.